Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Rhetorical Use of Random Sampling

Crafting and Communicating the Public Image of Polls as a Science (1935-1948)

Bibliographic Data

ID4004258
AuthorsDominic Lusinchi (0000-0002-6956-2349, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume53
Issue2
Pages113-132
Publication date2017-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-5061 • E-ISSN: 1520-6696
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/jhbs.21836
PMID28191910
OpenAlexW2588019379
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited46

The scientific pollsters (Archibald Crossley, George H. Gallup, and Elmo Roper) emerged onto the American news media scene in 1935. Much of what they did in the following years (1935-1948) was to promote both the political and scientific legitimacy of their enterprise. They sought to be recognized as the sole legitimate producers of public opinion. In this essay I examine the, mostly overlooked, rhetorical work deployed by the pollsters to publicize the scientific credentials of their polling activities, and the central role the concept of sampling has had in that pursuit. First, they distanced themselves from the failed straw poll by claiming that their sampling methodology based on quotas was informed by science. Second, although in practice they did not use random sampling, they relied on it rhetorically to derive the symbolic benefits of being associated with the "laws of probability

Art · Legitimacy · Literature · Media studies · Political science · Politics · Polling · Public opinion · Public relations · Rhetorical question · Sampling (signal processing · Sociology · American History and Culture · Computer Science · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Law · Philosophy and History of Science

  • Isis Current Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences 2019

    Francesco Luzzini•Isis•2019

  • How to train your oracle

    Open Access•Christian Dayé•Social Studies of Science•2018

  • Opinion Polls across Boundaries

    Open Access•Solange Ploeg, Eskil Vesterlund•Contemporary European History•2025

  • Intersecting aims, divergent paths

    Open Access•Sonja G Ostrow•Journal of the History of the…•2021

  • More work, better health? The moderation effect of employee-organizational psychological distance

    Open Access•Bei Liu, Hong Chen et al.•Journal of Health Psychology•2021

  • The decline of popular politics

    Michael E Mcgerr•The decline of popular politics•1986

  • The Wizard of Washington

    Open Access•Melvin G Holli, M Holli•Wizard of Washington•2002

  • Fundamental Development of the Social Sciences

    Donald Fisher•Fundamental development of the…•1993

  • Theoretical sociology

    Edward A Tiryakian, John C Mckinney•Theoretical sociology•1970

  • Profession of medicine

    Eliot Freidson•Profession of medicine•1970

  • Polling as Ritual

    Open Access•Lisbeth Lipari•Journal of Communication•1999

  • The Measure of Democracy

    Daniel Robinson, Daniel J Robinson•Measure of Democracy•1999

  • Survey Research in the United States

    Jean M Converse•Survey Research in the United…•2017

  • Outsiders Studies in the Sociology of Deviance

    Beatrice Werble•Archives of General Psychiatry•1966

  • Fifty Years of Survey Sampling in the United States

    Martin R Frankel, Lester R Frankel•Public Opinion Quarterly•1987

  • The Polls and Public Opinion; The Iowa Conference on Attitude and Opinion Research Sponsored by the State University of Iowa, Iowa City

    C J Nuesse, Norman C Meier et al.•The American Catholic Sociological…•1949

  • Straw Poll Journalism and Quantitative Data

    Dominic Lusinchi•Journalism Studies•2014

  • George Gallup and the rhetoric of scientific democracy

    J Michael Hogan•Communication Monographs•1997

  • Origins of the Ideal of Objectivity in the Professions

    Egon Bittner, M Schudson•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1991

  • The Measurement of Public Opinion

    Open Access•Elmo C Wilson•The Annals of the American…•1947

  • News, Culture and Public Life

    David Ryfe, David M Ryfe•Journalism Studies•2006

  • Representative Sampling and Poll Reliability

    Wilk, S S Wilks•Public Opinion Quarterly•1940

  • Recent Developments in the Straw-Poll Field

    Claude E Robinson•Public Opinion Quarterly•1937

  • The Changing Climate for Public Opinion Research

    George Gallup•Public Opinion Quarterly•1957

  • Report on the Analysis of Pre-Election Polls and Forecasts

    The Committee On Analysis Of Pre-Election Polls, Forecasts Of The Social…•Public Opinion Quarterly•1948

  • Straw Polls in 1936

    Archibald M Crossley•Public Opinion Quarterly•1937

  • Area Sampling or Quota Control?-Three Sampling Experiments

    Joseph R Hochstim, Dilman M K Smith•Public Opinion Quarterly•1948

  • Area Sampling--Some Principles of Sample Design

    Morris H Hansen, Philip M Hauser•Public Opinion Quarterly•1945

  • American Institute of Public Opinion-Surveys, 1935-38

    George Gallup, Claude E Robinson et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1938

  • The Statistical Turn in American Social Science

    Charles Camic, Yu Xie•American Sociological Review•1994

  • The 1928-1936 Partisan Realignment

    Open Access•Robert S Erikson, Kent L Tedin•American Political Science Review•1981

  • Public Opinion and Public Opinion Polling

    Herbert Blumer•American Sociological Review•1948

  • A gold mine and a tool for democracy

    Open Access•Sarah E Igo•Journal of the History of the…•2006

Unique citing works5
Citations per year0,63
Citation span2018 - 2025 (8)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae