Page Limits on Economics Articles
Evidence from Two Journals
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4030106 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Card (0000-0001-6914-6698, Class of 1950 Professor of Economics at the University of California, Berkeley, California. Director of the Labor Studies Program, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.), Stefano Dellavigna (Sr. Distinguished Professor of Economics and Professor of Business Administration at the University of California, Berkeley, California. Faculty Associate, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts. .) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 149-168 |
| Publication date | 2014-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Economic Perspectives (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0895-3309 • E-ISSN: 1944-7965 |
| Publisher | American Economic Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1257/jep.28.3.149 |
| OpenAlex | W2128497034 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 26 |
| References cited | 4 |
Over the past four decades the median length of the papers published in the "top five" economic journals has grown by nearly 300 percent. We study the effects of a page limit policy introduced by the American Economic Review (AER) in mid-2008 and subsequently adopted by the Journal of the European Economic Association (JEEA) in 2009. We find that the imposition of a 40-page limit on submissions led to no change in the flow of new papers to the AER. Instead, authors responded by shortening and reformatting their papers. For JEEA, in contrast, we conclude that the page-limit policy led authors of longer papers to submit to other journals. These results imply that the AER has substantial monopoly power over submissions, while JEEA faces a very competitive market. Evidence from both journals, and from citations to published papers in the top journals, suggests that longer papers are of higher quality than shorter papers, so the loss of longer submissions at JEEA may have led to a drop in quality. Despite a modest impact of the AER's policy on the average length of submissions, the policy had little or no effect on the length of final accepted manuscripts
Economics · Monopoly · Political science · Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance · Corporate Finance and Governance · Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Aligning taxes and spending
Perceptions of institutional quality and justification of tax evasion
Enforce taxes, but cautiously
Liability, morality, and image concerns in product accidents with third parties
Informality, regulation and productivity
Risk Exposure, Humanitarianism and Willingness to Pay for Universal Healthcare
The arithmetics and politics of domestic resource mobilization for poverty eradication
Reducing nonpayment for public utilities
Tax evasion and tax morale
The effects of official and unofficial information on tax compliance
Tax morale and fairness in conflict an experiment
How income and tax rates provoke cheating – An experimental investigation of tax morale
An experimental test of two policies to increase donations to public projects
Ethnicity and tax filing behavior
State coercion, moral attitudes, and tax compliance
Understanding cross-cultural differences in peer reporting practices
Foreign Aid and State Legitimacy
The Production of Knowledge
Nine Facts about Top Journals in Economics
Exploratory Research
Star Wars
Article length and citation outcomes
Jue 2007–2023
Special Issue of JUE Insight Papers
Theory and Measurement
The path of economics research production
| Unique citing works | 26 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2024 (12) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |