College Major and Career Inequality
Implications for Black Students
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4048408 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gail E Thomas (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1985 |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 537 |
| Publication date | 1985-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Negro Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-2984 • E-ISSN: 2167-6437 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2294714 |
| OpenAlex | W2000406074 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
Over the past decade, interest in women and racial minorities in higher education has been primarily in their access, retention, and patterns of distribution throughout higher education, and the implications of these processes for their career attainment. More recently, this interest has been extended to consider the internal stratification processes within higher education and the academic and social experiences of women and racial minorities in these institutions. The type of college major that students choose (or get selected into) is an important stratification variable within higher education that has direct implications for race and sex inequality in the labor market. For the past three decades, black and female college students have been consistently overrepresented in education, the humanities, and the social sciences. These fields offer lower income for B.A. degree recipients than the natural and technical sciences. The data in Table I reports the annual starting salaries for B.A. recipients in various majors in 1978 and 1982. In both years, students who majored in the humanities and the social sciences received lower salary offers than students who majored in engineering, the computer sciences, and the physical and earth sciences. Thus, part of the race and sex differences in occupational and income attain
Demographic economics · Economics · Inequality · Mathematics education · Racial bias · Racism · Sociology · Gender Studies · Higher Education Research Studies · Mathematics · Psychology
Do Differential Grading Standards Across Fields Matter for Major Choice? Evidence from a Policy Change in Florida
Race differentials in college selectivity, 1981–2000
Choosing fields in an expansionary era
Math-oriented fields of study and the race gap in graduation likelihoods at elite colleges
Factors Associated with the Underrepresentation of African Americans in Mathematics and Science
Setting Our Own Agenda
Who Studies the Arts and Sciences? Social Background and the Choice and Consequences of Undergraduate Field of Study
Segregated by Subject
Family Socioeconomic Status, Parental Involvement, and College Major Choices-Gender, Race/Ethnic, and Nativity Patterns
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,25 |
| Citation span | 1990 - 2020 (31) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |