Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

College Major and Career Inequality

Implications for Black Students

Bibliographic Data

ID4048408
AuthorsGail E Thomas (corresponding author)
Year1985
Volume54
Issue4
Pages537
Publication date1985-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Negro Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-2984 • E-ISSN: 2167-6437
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2294714
OpenAlexW2000406074
LanguageEN
Citations received9

Over the past decade, interest in women and racial minorities in higher education has been primarily in their access, retention, and patterns of distribution throughout higher education, and the implications of these processes for their career attainment. More recently, this interest has been extended to consider the internal stratification processes within higher education and the academic and social experiences of women and racial minorities in these institutions. The type of college major that students choose (or get selected into) is an important stratification variable within higher education that has direct implications for race and sex inequality in the labor market. For the past three decades, black and female college students have been consistently overrepresented in education, the humanities, and the social sciences. These fields offer lower income for B.A. degree recipients than the natural and technical sciences. The data in Table I reports the annual starting salaries for B.A. recipients in various majors in 1978 and 1982. In both years, students who majored in the humanities and the social sciences received lower salary offers than students who majored in engineering, the computer sciences, and the physical and earth sciences. Thus, part of the race and sex differences in occupational and income attain

Demographic economics · Economics · Inequality · Mathematics education · Racial bias · Racism · Sociology · Gender Studies · Higher Education Research Studies · Mathematics · Psychology

  • Do Differential Grading Standards Across Fields Matter for Major Choice? Evidence from a Policy Change in Florida

    Open Access•Verónica Minaya•Research in Higher Education•2020

  • Race differentials in college selectivity, 1981–2000

    Open Access•Niki T Dickerson, J A Jacobs•Journal of African American Studies•2006

  • Choosing fields in an expansionary era

    Open Access•David Zarifa•Research in Social Stratification…•2012

  • Math-oriented fields of study and the race gap in graduation likelihoods at elite colleges

    Open Access•D Gelbgiser, Sigal Alon•Social Science Research•2016

  • Factors Associated with the Underrepresentation of African Americans in Mathematics and Science

    Lois Powell•The Journal of Negro Education•1990

  • Setting Our Own Agenda

    Valora Washington, Joanna Newman•The Journal of Negro Education•1991

  • Who Studies the Arts and Sciences? Social Background and the Choice and Consequences of Undergraduate Field of Study

    K A Goyette, Ann L Mullen•The Journal of Higher Education•2006

  • Segregated by Subject

    Jacqueline C Simpson•The Journal of Higher Education•2001

  • Family Socioeconomic Status, Parental Involvement, and College Major Choices-Gender, Race/Ethnic, and Nativity Patterns

    Open Access•Yingyi Ma•Sociological Perspectives•2009

Unique citing works9
Citations per year0,25
Citation span1990 - 2020 (31)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae