Did Bach Compose Musical Works? Thinking with Adorno through Paradigms of Possibility
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4071373 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lydia Goehr (0000-0001-5840-150X, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-39 |
| Publication date | 2021-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | New German Critique (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0094-033X • E-ISSN: 1558-1462 |
| Publisher | Duke University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1215/0094033x-8732131 |
| OpenAlex | W3132234708 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 17 |
This essay presents Theodor W. Adorno's case pro and contra the regulation of the work-concept in a tradition that long sustained a great 1800 divide. The case is made through the provocation offered in Lydia Goehr's Imaginary Museum of Musical Works that "Bach did not intend to compose musical works." The essay investigates the many references to Johann Sebastian Bach in Adorno's aesthetic, social, and philosophical writings to show that his Bach case was not merely illustrative but paradigmatic of every case he made for a critical theory of possibility. Adorno's case was an urgent matter of rescue and justice, made by linking Bach's compositions to Arnold Schoenberg's paradigmata of a possible music through the mediation of the work-concept for which Ludwig van Beethoven was made in the tradition paradigmatically to stand
Aesthetics · Art · Art history · Epistemology · Literature · Mediation · Musical · Psychoanalysis · Social science · Sociology · The Imaginary · Art, Aesthetics, and Perception · Musicology and Musical Analysis · Philosophy · Psychology · Visual Culture and Art Theory
Music and society
After the Great Divide
Úvod do sociologie hudby
After the Great Divide
Adorno
Adorno-Handbuch
What Would Be Different
On Tradition
Does it Matter Where We Begin? Or, On the Art of Preparation and Preluding
Romantic Modernism
The Aging of the New Music
Philosophy of New Music
Dialectic of Enlightenment
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |