State Capacity and Innovation Policy Performance
A Comparative Study on Two Types of Innovation Projects in China
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4075154 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Kaidong Feng (0009-0002-2601-5537, Peking University, autor de correspondencia), Ziying Jiang (Peking University) |
| Año | 2021 |
| Volumen | 38 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 427-453 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2021-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Review of Policy Research (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1541-132X • E-ISSN: 1541-1338 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/ropr.12420 |
| OpenAlex | W3153257489 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 37 |
This study analyzes state capacity by comparing two types of innovation policies in China and estimating its impacts on policy performance. State capacity is defined as the extent to which the state can realize its objectives in policy and it is determined by government professionalism and penetration into industrial activities. Due to both the lack of channels to grasp information regarding complicated innovation processes and professional personnel capable of understanding such information, the state capacity demonstrated in these policies is low. The government relies more on indicators of innovation quantity rather than those of innovation quality as criteria for identifying innovation. This leads to poor policy performances in which grantees tend to meet only the qualitative requirements of the policies, namely increasing the number of patents, rather than engaging in genuine innovation and pursuing the essential objective of the policies. Therefore, even with market-oriented reform, transitional economies like China still need to strengthen state building for achieving policy objectives
Business · China · Economic growth · Economic system · Economics · Industrial organization · Industrial policy · International trade · Market penetration · Political science · Public economics · Public policy · State policy · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Innovation and Knowledge Management · Innovation Policy and RD · Marketing
Miti and the Japanese Miracle
Decentralized Authoritarianism in China
Measuring innovative performance
A Penny for Your Quotes
Governing by goals and numbers
The Cadre Management System, Post-Mao
Patent statistics
Government-subsidized R&D and firm innovation
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
The Myth of the Powerless State
The Reach of the State
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions
Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During the Post-1950 Period
Embedded autonomy
Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporatism in China
Forging then Taming Leviathan
The autonomous power of the state
Federalism as a Commitment to Preserving Market Incentives
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,4 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |