Analyses of Intrinsicality without Naturalness
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4079209 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dan Marshall (0000-0002-5763-3875, University of Hong Kong, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 186-197 |
| Publication date | 2013-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy Compass (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1747-9991 • E-ISSN: 1747-9991 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/phc3.12004 |
| OpenAlex | W1595515216 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 27 |
Over the last 30 years there have been a number of attempts to analyse the distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic properties. This article discusses three leading attempts to analyse this distinction that don't appeal to the notion of naturalness: the duplication analysis endorsed by G. E. Moore and David Lewis, Peter Vallentyne's analysis in terms of contractions of possible worlds, and the analysis of Gene Witmer, William Butchard and Kelly Trogdon in terms of grounding
Appeal · Epistemology · Naturalness · Physics · Political science · Psychoanalysis · Law · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology
A Theory of Conditionals
Metaphysical Dependence
Impossible Worlds
Extrinsic properties
New work for a theory of universals
The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics
The Metaphysics of Extrinsic Properties
The Non-Governing Conception of Laws of Nature
Intrinsicality and Hyperintensionality
Intrinsicality without Naturalness
Analyses of Intrinsicality in Terms of Naturalness
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,38 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2025 (13) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |