Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Agent-based models of scientific interaction

Bibliographic Data

ID4079550
AuthorsDunja Šešelja (0000-0001-5679-5787, Eindhoven University of Technology, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume17
Issue7
Publication date2022-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophy Compass (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1747-9991 • E-ISSN: 1747-9991
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/phc3.12855
OpenAlexW4281679618
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited66

The paper examines recent developments in agent-based modeling of scientific inquiry with a special focus on network epistemology. It provides a survey of different types of ABMs studying network effects in scientific inquiry: ABMs based on bandit problems, ABMs based on epistemic landscapes and ABMs based on argumentative dynamics. It further presents models that study the impact of biased and deceptive researchers on the success of collective inquiry. The paper concludes with a discussion on the contribution of ABMs to the broader field of philosophy of science given their highly idealized nature

Argumentative · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Field (mathematics · Focus (optics · Management science · Philosophy of science · Physics · Scientific modelling · Sociology · Computer Science · Engineering · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Game Theory and Applications · Mathematics · Philosophy

  • Modeling Innovations

    Open Access•José Ferraz-Caetano•Philosophies•2024

  • Authenticity and exclusion

    Open Access•Nil-Jana Akpinar, Sina Fazelpour•Synthese•2025

  • Social and cognitive diversity in science

    Open Access•Kristina H Rolin, Kristina Rolin et al.•Synthese•2023

  • The Ambiguity Dilemma for Imprecise Bayesians

    Mantas Radzvilas, William Peden et al.•The British Journal for the…•2024

  • Causal inference from clinical experience

    Open Access•Hamed Tabatabaei Ghomi, Jacob Stegenga•Philosophical Studies•2025

  • Inventing Temperature

    Haṡok Chang•Inventing Temperature•2004

  • Structural Holes

    R S Burt•Structural Holes•1992

  • The Epistemic Benefit of Transient Diversity

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman•Erkenntnis•2010

  • On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games

    Open Access•Phan Minh Dung•Artificial Intelligence•1995

  • A Strategic Model of Social and Economic Networks

    Open Access•Matthew O Jackson, Asher Wolinsky•Journal of Economic Theory•1996

  • Learning from Neighbours

    Venkatesh Bala, Sanjeev Goyal•The Review of Economic Studies•1998

  • Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning

    James G March•Organization Science•1991

  • Formal Models of Scientific Inquiry in a Social Context

    Open Access•Dunja Šešelja, Christian Straßer et al.•Journal for General Philosophy of…•2020

  • Scientific polarization

    Open Access•Cailin O’connor, James Owen Weatherall•European Journal for Philosophy…•2018

  • How to Relate Models to Reality? An Epistemological Framework for the Validation and Verification of Computational Models

    Open Access•Claudius Graebner•Journal of Artificial Societies…•2018

  • Rethinking the history of peptic ulcer disease and its relevance for network epistemology

    Open Access•Bartosz Michał Radomski, Dunja Šešelja et al.•History & Philosophy of the Life…•2021

  • What Is the Epistemic Function of Highly Idealized Agent-Based Models of Scientific Inquiry

    Open Access•Daniel Frey, Dunja Šešelja•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2018

  • Abstract argumentation and explanation applied to scientific debates

    Open Access•Dunja Šešelja, Christian Straßer•Synthese•2013

  • Argumentative landscapes

    Open Access•N Emrah Aydinonat, Samuli Reijula et al.•Synthese•2021

  • Endogenous epistemic factionalization

    Open Access•James Owen Weatherall, Cailin O’connor•Synthese•2021

  • The computational philosophy

    Open Access•Conor Mayo-Wilson, J Mevel et al.•Synthese•2021

  • Computational modeling in philosophy

    Open Access•Simon Scheller, Christoph Merdes et al.•Synthese•2022

  • Value of cognitive diversity in science

    Open Access•Samuli Pöyhönen, Samuli Reijula•Synthese•2017

  • Bias as an epistemic notion

    Open Access•Anke Bueter•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2022

  • The new demarcation problem

    Open Access•Bob Holman, Torsten Wilholt•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2022

  • Epistemic and methodological iteration in scientific research

    Open Access•Kevin C Elliott•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2012

  • How could models possibly provide how-possibly explanations

    Open Access•Philippe Verreault-Julien•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2019

  • The Communication Structure of Epistemic Communities

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman•Philosophy of Science•2007

  • Experimentation by Industrial Selection

    Open Access•Bob Holman, Justin Bruner•Philosophy of Science•2017

  • Epistemic Landscapes, Optimal Search, and the Division of Cognitive Labor

    Open Access•J Mckenzie Alexander, Johannes Himmelreich et al.•Philosophy of Science•2015

  • The Epistemic Division of Labor Revisited

    Open Access•Johanna Thoma•Philosophy of Science•2015

  • Epistemic Landscapes and the Division of Cognitive Labor

    Open Access•Michael Weisberg, Ryan Muldoon•Philosophy of Science•2009

  • The Independence Thesis

    Open Access•Conor Mayo-Wilson, Conor Mayo‐Wilson et al.•Philosophy of Science•2011

  • The Problem of Intransigently Biased Agents

    Open Access•Bob Holman, Bennett Holman et al.•Philosophy of Science•2015

  • Diversity, Trust, and Conformity

    Open Access•Sina Fazelpour, David Steel et al.•Philosophy of Science•2022

  • In Epistemic Networks, Is Less Really More

    Open Access•Sarita Rosenstock, Justin Bruner et al.•Philosophy of Science•2017

  • Conservatism and the Scientific State of Nature

    Erich Kummerfeld, Kevin J S Zollman•The British Journal for the…•2016

  • How to Beat Science and Influence People

    Open Access•James Owen Weatherall, Cailin O’connor et al.•The British Journal for the…•2020

  • Normative Formal Epistemology as Modelling

    Joe Roussos•The British Journal for the…•2025

  • Agent-Based Models of Dual-Use Research Restrictions

    Open Access•Elliott Wagner, Jonathan Herington•The British Journal for the…•2021

  • Robustness and Idealizations in Agent-Based Models of Scientific Interaction

    Open Access•Daniel Frey, Dunja Šešelja•The British Journal for the…•2018

  • Network effects in a bounded confidence model

    Open Access•Igor Douven, Rainer Hegselmann•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2022

  • The promise and perils of industry-funded science

    Open Access•Bob Holman, Kevin C Elliott•Philosophy Compass•2018

  • Network Epistemology

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman•Philosophy Compass•2013

  • The Strength of Weak Ties

    Mark Granovetter, Mark S Granovetter•American Journal of Sociology•1973

Unique citing works5
Citations per year1,67
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae