Words in context
The use of Fecit in the milestones of Roman Hispania
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4082409 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sergio España-Chamorro (0000-0001-6962-5859, Ausonius Institut de Recherche sur l'Antiquité et le Moyen age, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Issue | 120 |
| Pages | 123-134 |
| Publication date | 2022-12-09 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Pallas (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-0387 • E-ISSN: 2272-7639 |
| Publisher | OpenEdition (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.4000/pallas.25749 |
| OpenAlex | W4391666383 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 9 |
In epigraphy, the word fecit frequently appears in association with public works and infrastructures, indicating that the person associated with this verb was the investor in such facilities. We can find this word in some milestones dated from the age of Trajan, Hadrian, and Severus Alexander. The context of these inscriptions could reveal that their original meaning (‘made by’) is not correct and these cases reveal a means of propaganda using fecit instead of other epigraphic formulae. This paper deals with these inscriptions and with those that speak about repairing/rebuilding in order to understand the whole process. The conclusion can be that the intention of these emperors was to generate the idea that society owes the vital axes of terrestrial communication to Trajan and Hadrian, since they constructed them, even though in fact, they did not
Archaeology · Context (archaeology · Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History · Archaeological and Historical Studies · Classical Antiquity Studies · History
Deux nouvelles bornes de la voie Ebora-Pax Iulia
Summa difficultas faciendi pontis
Cuarto miliario bético de la serie Hadrianus Augustus fecit hallado fortuitamente en La Rinconada (Sevilla) / Fourth Roman milestone from Baetica of the series Hadrianus Avgustus Fecit preserved in the province of Seville
Constructing reconstruction
The reliability of Roman rebuilding inscriptions
Structure and Scale in the Roman Economy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|