Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

He Takes Some of My Time; I Take Some of His

An Analysis of Judicial Sentencing Patterns in Jury Cases

Bibliographic Data

ID4085490
AuthorsThomas M Uhlman, N Darlene Walker, N Walker (0000-0003-3865-4045)
Year1980
Volume14
Issue2
Pages323-341
Publication date1980-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLaw & Society Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0023-9216 • E-ISSN: 1540-5893
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/3053316
OpenAlexW2326978835
LanguageEN
Citations received27
References cited4

The jury has been widely credited with contributing to the best elements of the American judicial system. Utilizing computerized case histories of 29,000 felony defendants in an urban trial court, this article examines an important aspect of the jury process-judicial sentencing following jury trials. The data show that the sentencing cost of pursuing constitutionally guaranteed jury trial rights is high: jury defendants are punished with substantially greater harshness than are plea and bench convictees in essentially similar criminal cases. Regardless of sentencing philosophy, virtually every judge who sentenced jury, bench, and plea defendants sentenced jury defendants far more harshly and sent them to jail more frequently. Stiffer penalties for jury defendants appears to be the operational, though unstated, judicial policy, exercised out of the apparent administrative interest in reducing the number of lengthy jury trials

Criminology · Jury · Political science · Sociology · Jury Decision Making Processes · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies

  • Sentencing, Trends, and Disparities

    Open Access•Mindy S Bradley, J T Ulmer•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Beschleunigungsstrategien der Strafjustiz. Eine empirische Studie zum Strafbefehlsverfahren in der Schweiz

    Mirjam Stoll•Beschleunigungsstrategien der…•2018

  • Race and disparities in sentencing

    Cassia Spohn, Jerry Cederblom•Justice Quarterly•1991

  • Trial Penalties under Florida’s Sentencing Guidelines

    Open Access•Peter S Lehmann•Crime & Delinquency•2021

  • Recent Developments and New Directions in Sentencing Research

    J T Ulmer•Justice Quarterly•2011

  • The Organizational Context of Criminal Sentencing

    Jo Dixon•American Journal of Sociology•1995

  • From jury to judge

    Open Access•Anna S Knes, Hayley Carlisle et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•2026

  • Collateral Decision-Making

    Open Access•Caylin Louis Moore•American Sociological Review•2026

  • Plea Bargaining as a Game

    Open Access•Ronald A Harris, J Fred Springer•Review of Policy Research•1984

  • Gleiches (Straf-)Recht für alle

    Wolfgang Ludwig-Mayerhofer, Wolfgang Ludwig‐mayerhofer et al.•Zeitschrift für Soziologie•1997

  • Tolerated contests? Plea and sentence in the Victorian magistrates' courts

    Open Access•Roger Douglas•Journal of Criminal Justice•1988

  • The importance of county context in the measurement of sentence disparity

    Open Access•Laura B Myers, Sue Titus Reid•Journal of Criminal Justice•1995

  • Prosecutorial decisionmaking in the Netherlands

    Open Access•Marc G Gertz, Marc Gertz et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•1990

  • Judges, juries, and the decision to convict

    Open Access•Martha A Myers•Journal of Criminal Justice•1981

  • Predicting decisions rendered in criminal appeals

    Open Access•Jimmy J Williams•Journal of Criminal Justice•1991

  • Punishing Political Offenders

    Open Access•Brent L Smith, Kelly R Damphousse•Criminology•1996

  • Variation in Trial Penalties Among Serious Violent Offenses

    Open Access•J T Ulmer, Mindy S Bradley•Criminology•2006

  • Terrorism, Politics, and Punishment

    Open Access•Brent L Smith, Kelly R Damphousse•Criminology•1998

  • Adversarial and Nonadversarial Justice

    Open Access•G Lafree, Gary D Lafree•Criminology•1985

  • Does It Pay to Plead Guilty? Differential Sentencing and the Functioning of Criminal Courts

    Open Access•David Brereton, Jonathan D Casper•Law & Society Review•1982

  • Plea Bargaining Policy and State District Court Caseloads

    Open Access•M D Holmes, Howard C Daudistel et al.•Law & Society Review•1992

  • Trial by Plea Bargain

    Open Access•Debra S Emmelman•Law & Society Review•1996

  • Penalty effect of China's Plea Leniency System

    Open Access•Zebiao Shao, Qiong Wu•International journal of law,…•2025

  • Social control of the self’ and pleading guilty in criminal court

    Kathleen Auerhahn•International Review of Sociology•2012

  • Guilty Plea Courts

    Mike Mcconville, Chester Mirsky et al.•Social Problems•1995

  • An Integration of Theories to Explain Judicial Discretion

    Celesta A Albonetti•Social Problems•1991

  • Just Another Crime? Examining Disparity in Homicide Sentencing

    Open Access•Kathleen Auerhahn•Sociological Quarterly•2007

  • The Prosecutor's Role in Plea Bargaining

    Albert W Alschuler•The University of Chicago Law…•1968

  • American Criminal Justice

    Jonathan D Casper, Jonathan Casper•Stanford Law Review•1972

  • Some Determinants of the Method of Case Disposition

    Open Access•Lynn Mather, Lynn M Mather•Law & Society Review•1974

  • The Limits of Bail Reform

    Open Access•Roy B Flemming, Carol W Kohfeld et al.•Law & Society Review•1980

Unique citing works27
Citations per year0,6
Citation span1981 - 2026 (46)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 27

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae