He Takes Some of My Time; I Take Some of His
An Analysis of Judicial Sentencing Patterns in Jury Cases
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4085490 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thomas M Uhlman, N Darlene Walker, N Walker (0000-0003-3865-4045) |
| Year | 1980 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 323-341 |
| Publication date | 1980-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Law & Society Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0023-9216 • E-ISSN: 1540-5893 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/3053316 |
| OpenAlex | W2326978835 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 27 |
| References cited | 4 |
The jury has been widely credited with contributing to the best elements of the American judicial system. Utilizing computerized case histories of 29,000 felony defendants in an urban trial court, this article examines an important aspect of the jury process-judicial sentencing following jury trials. The data show that the sentencing cost of pursuing constitutionally guaranteed jury trial rights is high: jury defendants are punished with substantially greater harshness than are plea and bench convictees in essentially similar criminal cases. Regardless of sentencing philosophy, virtually every judge who sentenced jury, bench, and plea defendants sentenced jury defendants far more harshly and sent them to jail more frequently. Stiffer penalties for jury defendants appears to be the operational, though unstated, judicial policy, exercised out of the apparent administrative interest in reducing the number of lengthy jury trials
Criminology · Jury · Political science · Sociology · Jury Decision Making Processes · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies
Sentencing, Trends, and Disparities
Beschleunigungsstrategien der Strafjustiz. Eine empirische Studie zum Strafbefehlsverfahren in der Schweiz
Race and disparities in sentencing
Trial Penalties under Florida’s Sentencing Guidelines
Recent Developments and New Directions in Sentencing Research
The Organizational Context of Criminal Sentencing
From jury to judge
Collateral Decision-Making
Plea Bargaining as a Game
Gleiches (Straf-)Recht für alle
Tolerated contests? Plea and sentence in the Victorian magistrates' courts
The importance of county context in the measurement of sentence disparity
Prosecutorial decisionmaking in the Netherlands
Judges, juries, and the decision to convict
Predicting decisions rendered in criminal appeals
Punishing Political Offenders
Variation in Trial Penalties Among Serious Violent Offenses
Terrorism, Politics, and Punishment
Adversarial and Nonadversarial Justice
Does It Pay to Plead Guilty? Differential Sentencing and the Functioning of Criminal Courts
Plea Bargaining Policy and State District Court Caseloads
Trial by Plea Bargain
Penalty effect of China's Plea Leniency System
Social control of the self’ and pleading guilty in criminal court
Guilty Plea Courts
An Integration of Theories to Explain Judicial Discretion
Just Another Crime? Examining Disparity in Homicide Sentencing
| Unique citing works | 27 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,6 |
| Citation span | 1981 - 2026 (46) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 27 |