Adversarial and Nonadversarial Justice
A Comparison of Guilty Pleas and Trials
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9679752 |
|---|---|
| Authors | G Lafree (0000-0001-8418-1440, Decision Sciences (United States), corresponding author), Gary D Lafree |
| Year | 1985 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 289-312 |
| Publication date | 1985-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Criminology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0011-1384 • E-ISSN: 1745-9125 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1985.tb00338.x |
| OpenAlex | W2080808389 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 47 |
| References cited | 21 |
Despite the frequency of guilty pleas, researchers disagree about the ability of plea bargaining to provide justice. Critics argue that plea bargaining deprives defendants of due process rights and procedural safeguards Proponents argue that guilty pleas save resources for cases that require trial and allow officials flexibility to tailor justice to individual defendants. This article explores these issues by examining the effect of defendant and case characteristics on sentence severity for 3,269 male robbery and burglary defendants who either pled guilty or were tried in six U.S. jurisdictions, three of which had recently attempted to eliminate or greatly reduce plea bargaining and three with few restrictions on plea bargaining. The results confirm some criticisms of plea bargaining, but refute others. More criminally experienced defendants and defendants who pled guilty at the earliest opportunity did not receive sentencing leniency. Moreover, to a large extent, the same variables predict sentence severity for guilty pleas and trials. In contrast, the results show that defendants convicted at trial received more severe sanctions than defendants who pled guilty, controlling for case severity, evidence, and offender characteristics The results also suggest that the jurisdictions which attempted to control plea bargaining through more centralized control of assistance succeeded in tightening the fit between case characteristics and sentences for both cases adjudicated by guilty plea and trial
Criminal justice · Criminology · Economic Justice · Plea · Political science · Public defender · Sanctions · Sentence · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Jury Decision Making Processes · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Psychology · Social Psychology
Gendered Arrests or Gendered Sentencing
Sentencing, Trends, and Disparities
Racial and ethnic disparity in pretrial criminal processing
Race and disparities in sentencing
Social context and racial disparities in punishment decisions
Sentencing disparity and departures from guidelines
Blame based on one's name? Extralegal disparities in criminal conviction and sentencing
Where is the Evidence? Comparing the Effects of Evidence Strength and Demographic Characteristics on Plea Discounts
Satisfaction, Legitimacy, and Guilty Pleas
Is There a (Pre)Trial Penalty? Assessing the Joint Impacts of Pretrial Detention and Trial Conviction on Sentencing
Trial Penalties under Florida’s Sentencing Guidelines
The Organizational Context of Criminal Sentencing
From jury to judge
Conviction Odds in Chicago Homicide Cases
Effects of Individual Characteristics on Plea Negotiations Under Sentencing Guidelines
The Imprisonment Race
Trial by Plea Bargain
The Effects of Participants' Ethnicity and Gender on Monetary Outcomes in Mediated and Adjudicated Civil Cases
Plea Bargaining, Conviction Without Trial, and the Global Administratization of Criminal Convictions
Gender-based judicial ingroup bias in sex crime sentencing
Sociolegal Approaches to the Study of Guilty Pleas and Prosecution
Is the Impact of Cumulative Disadvantage on Sentencing Greater for Black Defendants
Trials and Tribulations
Electoral cycles in the administration of criminal justice
Tolerated contests? Plea and sentence in the Victorian magistrates' courts
The impact of race on the adjudication of sexual assault and other violent crimes
Recalibrating the risk of false confession wrongful convictions
The Interaction of Race, Gender, and Age in Criminal Sentencing
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Sentencing Departures Across Modes of Conviction
Punishing Political Offenders
Judges' Unequal Contributions to Extralegal Disparities in Imprisonment
Variation in Trial Penalties Among Serious Violent Offenses
Terrorism, Politics, and Punishment
The Juvenile Penalty
The Effect of Victim Participation in Sentencing on Sentence Outcome
Sex-Based Disparities in Felony Dispositions Before Versus After Sentencing Reform in Ohio
Pressures to Plead Guilty
Exploring sentencing in three European cities
Structural bias in the sentencing of felony defendants
Social control of the self’ and pleading guilty in criminal court
The Role of Courtroom Workgroups in Felony Case Dispositions
Symbol and Substance
(Un)anticipated Effects of Sentencing Reform on the Disparate Treatment of Defendants
Influence of Race and Ethnicity on Charge Severity in Chicago Homicide Cases
Racial Disproportionality in Iowa and Missouri's Prison Systems
Trial Judges in a Rural Court Community
Just Another Crime? Examining Disparity in Homicide Sentencing
Felony justice
Applied Regression
The Prosecutor's Role in Plea Bargaining
Plea bargaining
The Differential Sentencing of White-Collar Offenders in Ten Federal District Courts
Societal Reaction to Deviants
The Effect of Sexual Stratification By Race on Official Reactions to Rape
Extra-Legal Attributes and Criminal Sentencing
The Legal/Extra-Legal Controversy
Plea Bargains, Concessions and the Courts
The Practice of Law as Confidence Game Organizational Cooptation of a Profession
Some Determinants of the Method of Case Disposition
He Takes Some of My Time; I Take Some of His
Does It Pay to Plead Guilty? Differential Sentencing and the Functioning of Criminal Courts
Rule Departures and Making Law
| Unique citing works | 47 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,24 |
| Citation span | 1988 - 2026 (39) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 46 |