Maritime security in the United States
Latent threats and latent vulnerabilities
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4087332 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hugh W Stephens (University of Houston, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1990 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 554-573 |
| Publication date | 1990-12-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Terrorism and Political Violence (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0954-6553 • E-ISSN: 1556-1836 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09546559008427083 |
| OpenAlex | W2070964938 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 2 |
Americans and their government are seemingly unconcerned about the possibility that maritime facilities and personnel might be at risk to armed violence. Not only are current maritime security efforts minimal, they feature a curious dichotomy: one thrust is directed toward occasional acts of terrorism, the other toward coastal defense in wartime. Despite a manifestly more interactive world marked by the ready availability of powerful, mobile weapons, no serious efforts have been directed toward protecting maritime facilities and personnel in the United States against special operations or unconventional warfare. This indifference reflects the prevalence of the Clausewitzian paradigm in America's attitude toward war and the country's historical experience with coastal defense in the wars of this century. The fragmented structure of civil and military protection available to protect ports and other facilities suggests that protection could not be quickly upgraded in the face of a rapidly‐developing threat
Biological warfare · Business · Computer security · Criminology · Maritime Security · Political economy · Political science · Sociology · Terrorism · Computer Science · Law · Maritime Security and History · Military and Defense Studies · Military History and Strategy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|