Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Contracting communities

Conceptualizing Community Benefits Agreements to improve citizen involvement in urban development projects

Bibliographic Data

ID4139414
AuthorsLeonie B Janssen-Jansen (WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY, THE NETHERLANDS), Leonie Janssen-Jansen (Wageningen University & Research, corresponding author), Menno Van Der Veen (University of Amsterdam/Tertium, the Netherlands)
Year2017
Volume49
Issue1
Pages205-225
Publication date2017-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironment and Planning A Economy and Space (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0308-518X • E-ISSN: 1472-3409
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0308518x16664730
OpenAlexW2512350615
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited52

Contractual agreements are becoming increasingly important for city governments seeking to manage urban development. Contractual governance involves direct relations between the local state and different public and private actors and citizens. Although abundant literature exists on public-private partnerships related to urban development projects, agreements made between citizens, interest organizations and market parties, such as Community Benefits Agreements remain under-explored and under-theorized. While it may seem that the state is absent from contemporary forms of contractual governance, such agreements remain highly intertwined with government policies. The central aim of this paper is to better conceptualize Community Benefits Agreement practices in order to build understanding of how contractual governance caters for direct end-user involvement in urban development, and to yield insights into its potential as to render development processes more inclusive. Based on academic literature in planning and law, expert interviews and several case studies in New York City, this paper conceptualizes end-user involvement in urban development projects and innovates within urban planning and governance theory through the use of two new concepts-project collectivity and the image of a fourth chair

Business · Collaborative governance · Corporate governance · Political science · Public participation · Public relations · Urban planning · Engineering · Public Administration · Public-Private Partnership Projects · Urban and Rural Development Challenges · Urban Planning and Governance · Finance

  • Stakeholders’ perspectives, placemaking and tactical urbanism on the spatial reconfiguration of urban schools in Timişoara, Romania

    Open Access•Adelina Camelia Tuţă, Alexandru Dragan et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • Accepting Depoliticisation? Council Members’ Attitudes Towards Public-Public Contracts in Spatial Planning

    Open Access•Pia Bäcklund, Vesa Kanninen et al.•Planning Theory & Practice•2023

  • Developer contributions and community benefits

    Matthew Kearney, Heather Ritchie•Town Planning Review•2021

  • Winds of fortune? Understanding the geographic, sociodemographic, and temporal distribution of benefit mechanisms from land-based wind projects in the United States

    Open Access•Matilda Kreider, Candida G Brush et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2025

  • Community benefit agreements for solar energy

    Open Access•Simona Trandafir, Priya Treesa Thomas et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2023

  • Bargaining for Benefits

    Open Access•Nicholas A Robinson•Urban Affairs Review•2025

  • Contracting with citizens

    Open Access•E W Stapper•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Symbolic or substantive? Intermediaries and the practice of public participation

    Prananda Navitas, Yasmin Nabila et al.•Planning Practice and Research•2026

  • Heritage as a Vehicle for Development

    L Veldpaus, John Pendlebury•Planning Practice and Research•2023

  • Urban megaprojects and water justice in Southeast Asia

    Open Access•Scott Hawken, Behnaz Avazpour et al.•Cities•2021

  • Governance transformation among urbanization in China

    Open Access•Shurong Yao, Yujun Zhou et al.•Habitat International•2024

  • Contractual arrangements and entrepreneurial governance

    Open Access•Martijn van den Hurk, Tuna Taşan-Kok•Urban Studies•2020

  • Private ordering of public processes

    Open Access•E W Stapper•Urban Studies•2022

  • Building Together” in Baltimore? Corporate Megadevelopment and Coalitions for Community Power

    Open Access•P Nicole King, Meghan Ashlin Rich•Urban Affairs Review•2022

  • Public-Private Partnerships

    Stephen P Osborne, Stephen Osborne•Public-Private Partnerships•2000

  • Collaborative Planning

    Open Access•Patsy Healey•Collaborative Planning•2006

  • Co-production and collaboration in planning – The difference

    Watson, Vanessa Watson•Planning Theory & Practice•2014

  • Understanding and Overcoming the Nimby Syndrome

    Michael Dear•Journal of the American Planning…•1992

  • Public/Private Development

    Lynne B Sagalyn•Journal of the American Planning…•2007

  • Learning from Difference

    Open Access•Charles F Sabel, Jonathan Zeitlin•European Law Journal•2008

  • Community Benefits Agreements and Local Government

    Laura Wolf-Powers, Laura Wolf‐Powers•Journal of the American Planning…•2010

  • Planning Through Consensus Building

    Judith E Innes•Journal of the American Planning…•1996

  • Case Study Research

    Harris Chaiklin•The Journal of Nervous and Mental…•1991

  • Soft contractualism? Facilitating institutional change in planning and development relations in Scotland

    M G Lloyd, Deborah Peel•Urban Research & Practice•2012

  • New Labour's ‘Paradox of Responsibility’ and the Unravelling of its Macroeconomic Policy

    Open Access•Matthew Watson•The British Journal of Politics…•2012

  • Empowering Communities through Deliberation The Model of Community Benefits Agreements

    Open Access•Murtaza Baxamusa, Murtaza H Baxamusa•Journal of Planning Education and…•2008

  • Reframing Community Practice for the 21 St Century

    William Sites, Robert J Chaskin et al.•Journal of Urban Affairs•2007

  • Civic Capacity and School/Community Partnerships in a Fragmented Suburban Setting

    Todd Swanstrom, W A Winter et al.•Journal of Urban Affairs•2013

  • Escaping the Local Trap? The Role of Community-Representing Organizations in Urban Governance

    Kyu-Nahm Jun•Journal of Urban Affairs•2012

  • The Politics of Eminent Domain

    Christopher Niedt•Urban Geography•2013

  • Urban Change and Conflict

    Michael Ball, Paul J Maginn•Housing Studies•2005

  • What Is Community? An Evidence-Based Definition for Participatory Public Health

    Kathleen M Macqueen, Eleanor Mclellan et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2001

  • Urban Regeneration's Poisoned Chalice

    Open Access•Patricia Spears Jones, Peris S Jones•Urban Studies•2003

  • Governing the new metropolis

    Open Access•John Harrison, Michael Hoyler•Urban Studies•2014

  • The legitimacy of regional governance networks

    Open Access•Melika Levelt, Tamara Metze•Urban Studies•2014

  • Hey, Mayors, Leave Them Kids Alone

    Open Access•Anat Gofen, Rotem Bresler-Gonen et al.•Urban Affairs Review•2014

  • Managing Public Service Contracts

    Open Access•Trevor L Brown, Matthew Potoski et al.•Public Administration Review•2006

  • Neighbourhood Governance

    Catherine Durose, Vivien Lowndes•Local Government Studies•2010

  • Agents or Stewards

    David M Van Slyke•Journal of Public Administration…•2006

  • Governance Innovation and the Citizen

    Open Access•E Swyngedouw•Urban Studies•2005

  • Finding Common Ground

    Open Access•Lynne C Manzo, Douglas D Perkins•Journal of Planning Literature•2006

  • Governing Ourselves

    Open Access•Georgina Blakeley•International Journal of Urban…•2010

  • Contracts and Learning in Complex Urban Projects

    Open Access•Menno Van Der Veen, W K Korthals Altes•International Journal of Urban…•2012

  • Variegated neoliberalization

    Open Access•Neil Brenner, J Peck et al.•Global Networks•2010

  • Power and Contingency in Planning

    Open Access•Kristof Van Assche, Martijn Duineveld et al.•Environment and Planning A…•2014

  • Expert Conceptualisations of the Role of Lay Knowledge in Environmental Decisionmaking

    Open Access•Judith Petts, Catherine Francis Brooks et al.•Environment and Planning A…•2006

  • Responsible Citizens and Accountable Service Providers? Renegotiating the Contract between Citizen and State

    Open Access•Liz Richardson, Kingsley Purdam et al.•Environment and Planning A…•2014

Unique citing works14
Citations per year2.33
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 14

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae