Seeing What Is Not There

Pictorial Experience, Imagination and Non-localization

Bibliographic Data

ID4159528
AuthorsMikael Pettersson (0000-0003-3666-0396, Stockholm University, corresponding author)
Year2011
Volume51
Issue3
Pages279-294
Publication date2011-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe British Journal of Aesthetics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-0904 • E-ISSN: 1468-2842
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/aesthj/ayr014
OpenAlexW2004896845
LanguageEN
Citations received5

Pictures let us see what is not there. Or rather, since what pictures depict is not really there, we do not really see the things they are pictures of. Ever since Richard Wollheim introduced the notion of seeing-in into philosophical aesthetics, as part of his theory of depiction, there has been a lively debate about how, precisely, to understand this experience. However, one (alleged) feature of seeing-in that Wollheim pointed to has been almost completely absent in the subsequent discussion, namely that seeing-in allows for non-localization. When looking at a picture, Wollheim says, there is not always an answer to the question of where one sees a certain thing in a picture. If Wollheim is right in this, pictures indeed let us see what is not there: we see things in pictures, but there is no ‘there’ where we see those things. In this paper I argue against Wollheim's claim that object-seeing-in allows for non-localization. But there is, I argue, a pictorial experience, which is closely tied to seeing-in and which is non-localized, namely (what I call) pictorial perceptual presence

Aesthetics · Art · Depiction · Epistemology · Linguistics · Object (grammar · Perception · Aesthetic Perception and Analysis · Philosophy · Psychology · Visual Culture and Art Theory

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub