Serial Fiction, the End
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4159669 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lucie Walters (0000-0003-3899-3522, University of Southampton, corresponding author), Lee Walters |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 55 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 323-341 |
| Publication date | 2015-07-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The British Journal of Aesthetics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-0904 • E-ISSN: 1468-2842 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/aesthj/ayv013 |
| OpenAlex | W2231801765 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 2 |
Andrew McGonigal presents some interesting data concerning truth in serial fictions.1 Such data has been taken by McGonigal, Cameron and Caplan to motivate some form of contextualism or relativism. I argue, however, that many of these approaches are problematic, and that all are under-motivated as the data can be explained in a standard invariantist semantic framework given some independently plausible principles
Art · Cinema and Media Studies · Computer Science · Digital Games and Media · Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2024 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |