Exceptional Cases

Epistemic Contributions and Normative Expectations

Bibliographic Data

ID4180002
AuthorsIvan Ermakoff (University of Wisconsin–Madison, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume55
Issue2
Pages223-243
Publication date2014-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Journal of Sociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-9756 • E-ISSN: 1474-0583
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0003975614000101
OpenAlexW2015811163
LanguageEN
Citations received44
References cited55

Exceptional cases are at odds with the typical: they stand out as bizarre and rare. What then could justify their systematic analysis? Elaborating the analytical distinction between anomalies, exceptions and outliers, this paper outlines three potential epistemic contributions of exceptional cases. First, exceptional cases reveal the limits of standard classification categories. In so doing, they problematize usual classificatory grids. Their input is critical. Second, exceptional cases point to new classes of objects. They acquire paradigmatic status when they exemplify the characteristic features of these new classes with utmost clarity. Third, exceptional cases magnify relational patterns that in more mundane contexts lack visibility. Here their contribution is heuristic. These three contributions become possible when we put at bay normative expectations of what should happen, and specify cases by reference to an analytical space of constitutive dimensions. To underscore the general significance of these observations, I draw on examples borrowed from different quarters of the social sciences: the sociology of organizations, ethnomethodology, comparative historical sociology and the history of science

CLARITY · Ethnomethodology · Objectivity (philosophy · Odds · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Management and Organizational Studies · Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub