Cleaning up data work
Negotiating meaning, morality, and inequality in a tech startup
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5260728 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Benjamin Shestakofsky (0000-0003-0797-2729, University of Pennsylvania, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Publication date | 2024-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Big Data & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2053-9517 • E-ISSN: 2053-9517 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/20539517241285372 |
| OpenAlex | W4402850880 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 36 |
Data work-the routinized, information-processing operations that support artificial intelligence systems-has been portrayed as a source of both economic opportunity and exploitation. Existing research on the moral economy of data work focuses on platforms where individuals anonymously complete one-off projects for as little as one cent per task. However, data work is increasingly performed inside organizational settings to promote more consistent and accurate output. How do technologists and data workers construct and morally justify these arrangements? This article is based on 19 months of participant-observation research inside a San Francisco-based startup. Drawing on theories of relational work, I show how managers in San Francisco and contractors in the Philippines collaborated to "clean up" the morally questionable status of data work. Managers attempted to engineer interactions with data workers to emphasize fun and friendship while obscuring vast inequalities. Filipino data workers framed American managers as benevolent patrons and themselves as grateful clients to reinforce managers' sense of responsibility for their well-being. By shifting attention from the structure of roles to the structure of relationships in organization-based data work, this article demonstrates the function of culture and meaning-making in both generating reliable and accurate data and reproducing status hierarchies in the tech industry. Additionally, this article's examination of the complex and often contradictory dynamics of organizational attachment and marginalization has implications for debates about how the conditions of data work can be improved
Epistemology · Inequality · Morality · Negotiation · Political science · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Employment and Welfare Studies · Engineering · Law · Philosophy · Sharing Economy and Platforms
Class Acts
Relational Inequalities
Embedded reproduction in platform data work
Encoding Race, Encoding Class
Dealing in Desire
The cultural work of microwork
The Californian ideology
Romance on a Global Stage
Online Labour Index 2020
Lifting the curtain
On the genealogy of machine learning datasets
The trainer, the verifier, the imitator
Billionaire Wilderness
Working for Free in the VIP
License to tweak
Exceptional Cases
Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia
A Relational Work Perspective on the Gig Economy
If He Just Knew Who We Were
Disembedded or Deeply Embedded? A Multi-Level Network Analysis of Online Labour Platforms
One Woman Helping Another
Relational Work in the Economy
Myths of Meritocracy, Friendship, and Fun Work
The Denigration of Heroes? How the Status Attainment Process Shapes Attributions of Considerateness and Authenticity
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 8 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |