Power and Luck
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4180328 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Steven Luke (0000-0003-0427-4773, New York University), Steven Lukes, Ladawn Haglund (0000-0003-2283-1924, Sustainability Institute) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 45-66 |
| Publication date | 2005-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Journal of Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-9756 • E-ISSN: 1474-0583 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0003975605000020 |
| OpenAlex | W2134984177 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 16 |
| References cited | 10 |
in applying rational choice theory to the debates about power, it has been proposed that distinguishing power from luck yields new insights. specifically, it has been suggested that, where social and institutional structures favour some and disfavour others, the former have the good luck to get what they want without trying and the latter the bad luck to be faced with collective action problems that prevent them from furthering their interests. against such proposals, it is argued that luck, thus understood, is non-explanatory and, moreover, depoliticizing. it is further argued that they exemplify a narrow conception of power that defines it as intentional, as involving positive interventions in the world, as furthering the wants of the powerful and as altering the incentive structures of others. such a conception closes off questions about the operations of power where these are more or less indirect, ongoing and often inaccessible to direct observation, and only very partially and superficially captured by the "snapshot'" accounts of structured interaction among strategic actors characteristic of rational choice theory. a broader and more dynamic view, revealing the complexities of power, allows that the powerful can hold and exert their power without intending to, without positively intervening in the world and irrespective of their actual "brute" wants; and that their power consists in being capable and responsible for affecting (negatively or positively) the subjective and/or objective interests of others
Economics · Epistemology · Explanatory power · Incentive · Law and economics · Luck · Microeconomics · Political science · Positive economics · Power (physics) · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics
Power distribution, the external environment and common property forest governance
Power
Why should we care about the definition of power
The Vast and Unsolved Enigma of Power”
Power in Firms as Political Entities
Between luck and stigma
Tourism place-making
Reply to Comments
From fringe to front? Assessing the voting influence of the radical right in the European Parliament
Right place, right time
Luck, Systematic Luck and Business Power
When does descriptive representation become substantive? Systematic luck, social power and the allocation of resources
The British Academy Brian Barry Prize Essay
Luck, chance, and happenstance?Perceptions of success and failure amongst fixed-term academic staff inUKhigher education
Bringing the street back in
Searle and his critics
| Unique citing works | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,8 |
| Citation span | 2006 - 2026 (21) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 15 |