Matrons and Mistresses
Women and boundaries in two Middle Eastern tribal societies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4180933 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nancy Tapper (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1980 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 59-79 |
| Publication date | 1980-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Journal of Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-9756 • E-ISSN: 1474-0583 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0003975600003520 |
| OpenAlex | W2145943530 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 5 |
This paper examines some variables which may explain differences in the position of women, particularly in Middle Eastern tribal societies. By position of women, I mean women's status and roles vis-à-vis men. I am primarily concerned with differences in the dominant or male models concerning women, and the behaviours associated with them, however at a number of points in the paper, for illumination, I refer to women's models of women-that is, muted or counterpart models which are alternative, and sometimes contradictory, to the men's models (E. Ardener 1972; 1975; S. Ardener 1975: xi-xii). But my main argument is in a different direction: I suggest that certain features of social organization and structure determine these dominant models concerning women. Among the more obvious explanations of this kind would be those in terms of economic factors, such as the types of social production (whether a given social group is predominantly pastoral nomad, settled agricultural, or urban commercial-industrial, etc.) or the sexual division of labour within the group. But in my view certain more subtle factors than these are also of explanatory importance. The problem arises from the study of two particular tribal societies, the Shahsevan of north-western Iran and the Durrani of north-central Afghanistan; the women's position in these two societies differs in three significant spheres, yet the economic factors suggested above cannot explain these differences, for the two societies are economically similar, and women are excluded to a similar degree from control of economic and political resources
Argument (complex analysis) · Division of labour · Economics · Geography · Political science · Politics · Position (finance) · Social group · Social position · Social relation · Social science · Sociology · Gender Studies · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Islamic Studies and History · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,09 |
| Citation span | 1981 - 2007 (27) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |