Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Information Source Use and Social Media Engagement

Examining their Effects on Origin of Covid-19 Beliefs

Bibliographic Data

ID4181657
AuthorsKristin E Gibson (0000-0002-1480-4005, University of Georgia, corresponding author), Catherine E Sanders (0000-0001-5787-8752, University of Georgia), Alexa J Lamm (0000-0003-1999-8803, University of Georgia)
Year2021
Volume11
Issue4
Publication date2021-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSAGE Open (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/21582440211061324
OpenAlexW3217126272
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited57

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), a highly infectious virus transmitted through droplets from sneezes and coughs, was declared a global pandemic in 2020. Measures implemented by organizations as a result of COVID-19 were controversial among United States (U.S.) citizens. Perceptions of governmental and scientific information further divided U.S. citizens and distrust in science fostered conspiratorial thinking toward the origin of the virus. The purpose of this study was to determine if critical thinking style (CTS), the use of COVID-19 information sources, and social media connections were predictors of origin of COVID-19 beliefs. A survey was disseminated to 1,048 U.S. adults in May 2020 when most states were under shelter-in-place orders. Results indicated select COVID-19 information sources used and social media connections predicted origin of COVID-19 beliefs. CTS was not a significant predictor. Findings revealed a partisan divide between COVID-19 information sources. Implications for science communicators engaging the public during crisis were discussed

2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Disease · Distrust · Outbreak · Pandemic · Perception · Political science · Politics · Public engagement · Public opinion · Public relations · Social media · Sociology · Communication in Education and Healthcare · Law · Medicine · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Social Psychology · Virology

  • Public Opinion Manipulation on Social Media

    Open Access•Zixuan Weng, Aijun Lin•International Journal of…•2022

  • Knowledge is Power…to misinform

    Open Access•Ben Wasike•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2024

  • Belief in Covid-19 related conspiracy theories around the globe

    Open Access•Emmanouil Alexandros Fotakis, Effie Simou•Health Policy•2023

  • Populism in the age of social media

    Open Access•Ihsan Yilmaz, Ana-Maria Bliuc et al.•New Media & Society•2026

  • Exploring Social Media Information Seeking During the Covid-19 Pandemic to Inform Science and Health Communication During a Crisis

    Open Access•Fallys Masambuka-Kanchewa, Alexa J Lamm et al.•SAGE Open•2024

  • Trust in Science and the Science of Trust

    Open Access•Friederike Hendriks, Dorothe Kienhues et al.•Trust and Communication in a…•2016

  • Using social and behavioural science to support Covid-19 pandemic response

    Jay Joseph Van Bavel, Katherine Baicker et al.•2020

  • Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication as an Integrative Model

    Barbara Reynolds, Matthew W Seeger•Journal of Health Communication•2005

  • Acceptance and adoption of protective measures during the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Simone Dohle, Tobias Wingen et al.•Social Psychological Bulletin•2020

  • Covid-19

    Open Access•David L Heymann, Nahoko Shindo•The Lancet•2020

  • Are HIV/Aids Conspiracy Beliefs a Barrier to HIV Prevention Among African Americans?

    Laura M Bogart, Sheryl Thorburn•JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune…•2005

  • Why we are poles apart on climate change

    Open Access•Dan Kahan, M C Mac Cracken et al.•Nature•2012

  • Set Correlation and Contingency Tables

    Open Access•Jacob Cohen•Applied Psychological Measurement•1988

  • Partisanship, health behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Shana Kushner Gadarian, W Goodman et al.•PLoS ONE•2021

  • Polarization and Public Health

    Hunt Allcott, Levi Boxell et al.•National Bureau of Economic…•2020

  • Indirect effects of Covid-19 on the environment

    Open Access•Manuel A Zambrano‐monserrate, Manuel A Zambrano-Monserrate et al.•The Science of The Total…•2020

  • The proximal origin of Sars-CoV-2

    Open Access•Kristian G Andersen, Andrew Rambaut et al.•Nature Medicine•2020

  • Why do people believe Covid-19 conspiracy theories

    Open Access•Joseph E Uscinski, A M Enders et al.•Harvard Kennedy School…•2020

  • A Bioweapon or a Hoax? The Link Between Distinct Conspiracy Beliefs About the Coronavirus Disease (Covid-19) Outbreak and Pandemic Behavior

    Open Access•Roland Imhoff, Pia Lamberty•Social Psychological and…•2020

  • The Role of Public Trust During Pandemics

    Michael Siegrist, Alexandra Zingg•European Psychologist•2013

  • Summary Report of the Aapor Task Force on Non-probability Sampling

    Reg Baker, J Michael Brick et al.•Journal of Survey Statistics and…•2013

  • The Benefits and Costs of Using Social Distancing to Flatten the Curve for Covid-19

    Open Access•Linda Thunström, Stephen C Newbold et al.•Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis•2020

  • Politicization and Polarization in Covid-19 News Coverage

    Open Access•P Sol Hart, Sedona Chinn et al.•Science Communication•2020

  • Framing the Origins of Covid-19

    Open Access•Toby Bolsen, Risa Palm et al.•Science Communication•2020

  • Conspiracy Theories

    Open Access•Cass R Sunstein, Adrian Vermeule•Journal of Political Philosophy•2008

  • Disinformation squared

    Open Access•Erhard Geißler, Robert Hunt Sprinkle•Politics and the Life Sciences•2013

  • How paranoid are conspiracy believers? Toward a more fine‐grained understanding of the connect and disconnect between paranoia and belief in conspiracy theories

    Open Access•Roland Imhoff, Pia Lamberty•European Journal of Social…•2018

  • Leadership Style, Crisis Response and Blame Management

    Open Access•Arjen Boin, Paul ‘t Hart et al.•Public Administration•2010

  • Crisis Communication in Public Health Emergencies

    Open Access•Paul Quinn•Life Sciences Society and Policy•2018

  • Using social and behavioural science to support Covid-19 pandemic response

    Open Access•Jay Joseph Van Bavel, Katherine Baicker et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2020

  • Who Do You Trust? The Consequences of Partisanship and Trust for Public Responsiveness to Covid-19 Orders

    Open Access•Daniel A N Goldstein, Johannes Wiedemann•Perspectives on Politics•2022

  • Psychological, Political, and Situational Factors Combine to Boost Covid-19 Conspiracy Theory Beliefs

    Open Access•Joanne M Miller•Canadian Journal of Political…•2020

  • Stars—They’re Sick Like Us! The Effects of a Celebrity Exemplar on Covid-19-Related Risk Cognitions, Emotions, and Preventative Behavioral Intentions

    Open Access•Elizabeth L Cohen•Science Communication•2020

  • Speaking of Climate Change

    Open Access•Scott Hanson-Easey, Susan Williams et al.•Science Communication•2015

  • Effects of Covid-19 Misinformation on Information Seeking, Avoidance, and Processing

    Open Access•Hye Kyung Kim, Jisoo Ahn et al.•Science Communication•2020

Citations per year1.25
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae