Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The carbon crater

Comparing anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions to historical planetary events

Bibliographic Data

ID4189174
AuthorsHal T Nelson (0009-0008-9478-2192, Portland State University, corresponding author), Paul Reynolds (0000-0002-2814-3690), Paul R Reynolds (0000-0002-0931-3025, Claremont Graduate University), Brian W Jewett (0000-0003-4986-809X, Claremont Graduate University)
Year2025
Volume12
Issue1
Pages79-98
Publication date2025-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Anthropocene Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2053-0196 • E-ISSN: 2053-020X
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/20530196241279373
OpenAlexW4403344476
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited44

Equilibrium climate sensitivity modeling relies heavily on paleoclimate records that were affected by meteorite impacts and volcanic explosions. This paper conducts a thought experiment by re-assembling known data and theories to shed new light on anthropogenic carbon waste. Anthropogenic activity, meteorite impacts and volcanic explosions all extract material from the Earth's crust and deposit it in the atmosphere. This thought experiment tests if the mass of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions from 1851 to 2021 is comparable to the mass of atmospheric emissions from historical planetary events. Approximately 3.60 trillion tons of anthropogenic carbon dioxide equivalents are converted into volume and then transformed into the shape of a meteorite impact structure named the "Carbon Crater." The 35 km crater (bounded by 34%-68% confidence intervals of 25-45 km) would rank 23rd on the list of known impact structures. The 2.6 km projectile required to create the Crater would be a 10 on the 1-10 Torino hazard scale described as ". . .capable of causing global climatic catastrophe. . ." The estimated re-occurrence interval for a projectile of this size is 5.3 million years. An interval of this time in Earth's recent history predates homo sapiens. The Crater's volume is exponentially larger than the 1883 eruption of Krakatoa and ranks as an 8 ("mega-colossal") on the 0-8 Volcanic Explosivity Index. The thought experiment indicates that the Carbon Crater's scale is comparable with large historical biospheric events. These results likely confer few direct implications for the study of the paleoclimate in climate modeling but might change conceptual understandings of atmospheric human waste. Additional empirical research is required to understand the potential impact of the Carbon Crater on conceptual change

Astrobiology · Atmospheric sciences · Carbon fibers · Earth science · Greenhouse gas · Impact crater · Physics · Environmental Science · Global Energy and Sustainability Research · Materials Science · Planetary Science and Exploration · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life · Geology · Oceanography

  • Modelling the anthropogenic deformation and density of fragmentation in the urban settlement area of Ankara (Türkiye)

    Open Access•M Uzun, Sultan Murat Uzun et al.•The Anthropocene Review•2026

  • Thought experiments in science and philosophy

    Gerald J Massey, Tamara Horowitz•Thought experiments in science…•1991

  • The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments

    Joerg H Y Fehige, Michael T Stuart et al.•Routledge Companion to Thought…•2017

  • An Assessment of Earth's Climate Sensitivity Using Multiple Lines of Evidence

    Open Access•Steven C Sherwood, M J Webb et al.•Reviews of Geophysics•2020

  • Fossil apes and human evolution

    Open Access•Sergio Almécija, Ashley S Hammond et al.•Science•2021

  • The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene

    Open Access•Colin N Waters, J Zalasiewicz et al.•Science•2016

  • The emergence and evolution of Earth System Science

    Open Access•Will Steffen, Katherine Richardson et al.•Nature Reviews Earth & Environment•2020

  • A safe operating space for humanity

    Open Access•Johan Rockström, Will Steffen et al.•Nature•2009

  • Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures

    Open Access•Nick Allum, Patrick Sturgis et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2007

  • Human impacts on planetary boundaries amplified by Earth system interactions

    Open Access•Steven J Lade, Will Steffen et al.•Nature Sustainability•2019

  • The evidential significance of thought experiment in science

    Open Access•James W Mcallister•Studies in History and Philosophy…•1996

  • Shared Mental Models

    Open Access•Arthur T Denzau, Douglass C North•Kyklos•1994

  • The onset of the Anthropocene

    Open Access•B D Smith, M A Zeder•Anthropocene•2013

  • The Working Group on the Anthropocene

    Open Access•J Zalasiewicz, Colin N Waters et al.•Anthropocene•2017

  • The shape of Anthropocene

    Open Access•Elisa Luciano•The Anthropocene Review•2023

  • The trajectory of the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Will Steffen, Wendy Broadgate et al.•The Anthropocene Review•2015

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae