Worthy of debate

Discursive Coherence and Agreement in the Formation of the Field of Sustainability in Higher Education

Bibliographic Data

ID4237755
AuthorsGrace Augustine (0000-0003-0793-6816, Northwestern University, corresponding author), B G King (0000-0001-9536-2351, Northwestern University, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume17
Issue1
Pages135-165
Publication date2019-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocio-Economic Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1475-1461 • E-ISSN: 1475-147X
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/ser/mwz020
OpenAlexW2954987402
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited55

This article explores the development of shared understanding in the field of environmental sustainability in higher education—a field that began with social movement pressure surrounding contentious issues and evolved over decades into a settled field. The study defines and traces two distinct elements of shared understanding in this field: discursive coherence and discursive agreement. Discursive coherence is a shared understanding of which issues matter to a field. Discursive agreement concerns how much agreement there is among field actors regarding those issues. To trace these indicators, we utilize topic modeling alongside qualitative coding of a sample of messages from an online forum of conversations focused on the nascent field. We find that discursive coherence increases over time, but that coherent issues are also more likely to exhibit disagreement, indicating that more coherent issues are seen as more consequential, and therefore more ‘worthy of debate’ in the nascent field.

Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy) · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Field (mathematics) · Linguistics · Media studies · Political science · Sociology · Sustainability · TRACE (psycholinguistics) · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Service-Learning and Community Engagement · Social and Cultural Dynamics

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access