Participatory processes for public lands
Do provinces practice what they preach
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4238861 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lauren F Miller (University of New Brunswick), Solange Nadeau (0000-0002-6315-8636, Natural Resources Canada) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2017-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Conservation Ecology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1195-5449 • E-ISSN: 1708-3087 |
| Publisher | Resilience Alliance (PUBLISHER • CA) |
| DOI | 10.5751/es-09142-220219 |
| OpenAlex | W2614584825 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
Here, we analyze the current spaces for public participation in Crown (public) land management through a comparative study that focuses on the Canadian provinces of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. We define spaces for public participation as opportunities for meaningful public involvement in the decision-making arena of forest management. We examine the experiences of public participation in these provinces in an exploratory study comparing perceptions of participatory processes and outcomes of the processes in these two provinces based on 15 years (1999-2014) of informant experience. The objective is to understand more fully the barriers and bridges to meaningful public participation and relate these perceptions to on-the-ground implementation. A primary goal is to understand how, over time, processes with unsatisfying outcomes shape the perceptions of the participants. Rather than focusing on one particular participatory process, this comparative study assesses participation over time to identify the limitations in the participatory environments of these two provinces. We take a qualitative research approach using semistructured interviews with 42 forestry stakeholders, combined with participant observation and document analysis. This research reveals: (1) the importance of historical and cultural context as ongoing power imbalances shape the current dialogue and spaces for participation; (2) periods of robust and sound attempts at public participation in both provinces, with disappointments in implementation giving rise to a sense of futility, a closed system, and mistrust of government and industry over time; (3) a system of privileged access in opposition to the ideals of deliberative democracy and an equitable decision-making process; (4) in New Brunswick, public land policy implementation that is not reflective of participatory processes or of interests outside government and industry; (5) in Nova Scotia, recent efforts to incorporate values outside the government-industry policy realm, demonstrating an attempt to shift toward a more collaborative system for public land management
Citizen journalism · Environmental planning · Environmental protection · Environmental resource management · Geography · Political science · Public participation · Agriculture and Rural Development Research · Environmental Science · French Urban and Social Studies · Public Administration
Spirit in the woods
Projecting population distribution under depopulation conditions in Japan
Spatially explicit residential and working population assumptions for projecting and assessing natural capital and ecosystem services in Japan
The emergence of social licence necessitates reforms in environmental regulation
Spiritual values in forest management plans in British Columbia and the Netherlands
A thematic review of forest certification publications from 2017 to 2021
Perceptions of public land governance from two Canadian provinces
| Citations per year | 0.88 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2018 - 2024 (7) |
| Highly cited | No |