Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A thematic review of forest certification publications from 2017 to 2021

Analysis of pattern and trends for future studies

Bibliographic Data

ID19587165
AuthorsEleine Juliana Malek (0000-0002-8048-090X, University of Kuala Lumpur, corresponding author), Abd Rahman Abdul Rahim (University of Technology Malaysia)
Year2022
Volume10
Pages100331
Publication date2022-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTrees Forests and People (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2666-7193 • E-ISSN: 2666-7193
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100331
OpenAlexW4295067330
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited61

Forest certification was introduced in the late 1980s as a countermeasure to address the deforestation and forest degradation issues which caused major concern among environmental activists. Forest certification was promoted as a voluntary tool to ensure that only timber and timber products from sustainably managed forests were marketed. Although much literature has been published on forest certification since its introduction, not many review papers are available that discuss various contexts of forest certification studies. This review was motivated by the stand that the forest certification system must be strengthened to enhance its contribution to sustainable forest management. Therefore, this review aims to synthesise the discussions on sustainable forest certification published in academic literature from 2017 to July 2021 and to identify potential future areas of study. The paper explores the forest certification debate through an extensive literature review by adopting a thematic review approach. The ATLAS.ti 8 tool was used to facilitate the thematic analysis of forest certification literature dating from 2017 to 2021. A thematic review of 70 articles identified 135 initial codes describing the context of forest certification studies. These were grouped into three main clusters: enabling conditions, execution and evaluation. The review revealed that most studies were conducted to investigate issues relating to the implementation and impact of forest certification, while a limited number of studies were conducted on the enabling conditions of effective forest certification implementation. The review contributes to the existing findings on current forest certification literature and can be used as a guideline to identify future areas of forest certification studies. It is proposed that future research should examine how to design effective forest certification planning and management to maximise its potential contribution to sustainable forest management

Cartography · Certification · Geography · Library science · Political science · Thematic map · Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology · Computer Science · Forest Management and Policy · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact · Law

  • Consumer awareness and willingness to pay for blockchain-based traceability systems in the forest nursery sector

    Open Access•Stefano Bruzzese, Simone Blanc et al.•Trees Forests and People•2025

  • Forest certification and its impact on business management and market performance

    Open Access•Mikel Zubizarreta, German Arana Landin et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2024

  • A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections

    Open Access•Arezoo Aghaei Chadegani, Hadi Salehi et al.•Asian Social Science•2013

  • Assessing the wood sourcing practices of the U.S. industrial wood pellet industry supplying European energy demand

    Open Access•Brian Kittler, Inge Stupak et al.•Energy Sustainability and Society•2020

  • Towards improved forestry performance

    Satria Astana, Wahyu Fathurrahman Riva et al.•The International Forestry Review•2020

  • Unintended impacts from forest certification

    Open Access•Jacqueline Doremus•Ecological Economics•2019

  • Shaping the implementation of the FSC standard

    Open Access•Marie-Gabrielle Piketty, Isabel Garcia Drigo•Forest Policy and Economics•2018

  • Forest certification, institutional capacity, and learning

    Open Access•Robin A Lewis, Stacey Renee Davis•Forest Policy and Economics•2015

  • The politics of scale in global governance

    Open Access•Maria S Tysiachniouk, Constance L Mcdermott et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2021

  • Non-state forest governance and ‘Responsibilization’

    Open Access•Denis Dobrynin, Elena Smirennikova et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2020

  • Mapping certified forests for sustainable management - A global tool for information improvement through participatory and collaborative mapping

    Open Access•Florian Kraxner, Dmitry Schepaschenko et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2017

  • Stakeholder Perceptions of the Environmental Effectiveness of Multi-stakeholder Initiatives

    Open Access•Chioma Okereke, Izabela A Stacewicz et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2018

  • Understanding landowners’ interest and willingness to participate in forest certification program in China

    Open Access•Nana Tian, Neelam C Poudyal et al.•Land Use Policy•2018

  • Participatory processes for public lands

    Open Access•Lauren F Miller, Solange Nadeau•Conservation Ecology•2017

Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae