Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cultural and empowerment priorities amid tensions in knowledge systems and resource allocation

Insights from the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area

Bibliographic Data

ID4239797
AuthorsEphraim Mpofu (0000-0002-9333-4338), Verena Radinger-Peer (0000-0001-6030-3300), Walter Musakwa (0000-0003-2173-0072), Marianne Penker (0000-0002-5185-9558), Katharina Gugerell (0000-0003-1768-8529)
Year2025
Volume30
Issue1
Publication date2025-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueConservation Ecology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1195-5449 • E-ISSN: 1708-3087
PublisherResilience Alliance (PUBLISHER • CA)
DOI10.5751/es-15729-300109
OpenAlexW4406357355
LanguageEN
Citations received1

Transfrontier Conservation Areas (TFCAs) are promoted as models of community-inclusive conservation, yet they often face criticism for inadequately incorporating community concerns into policy development. This study investigates community perspectives within the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area (GLTFCA) using Q-methodology to explore diverse viewpoints on Park Management Plans (PMPs). The research addresses three primary questions: which aspects of the PMP are most valued by GLTFCA communities; the extent of agreement and disagreement among these communities; and the areas where community viewpoints show the most significant tensions. Data was collected through Q-sort exercises with 103 participants from four GLTFCA communities, followed by post-sorting interviews to enhance validity. Findings reveal that empowerment and cultural heritage are the most dominant aspects valued by the communities. There is a strong preference for direct, tangible benefits over long-term promises. However, significant tensions exist between traditional knowledge systems and modern resource allocation strategies, highlighting the complexities of integrating diverse perspectives into park management. The study's implications suggest that TFCA policies need to better align management strategies with community priorities, emphasizing tangible benefits and cultural heritage to enhance community engagement. Additionally, addressing epistemological diversity by providing diverse approaches linking to the pluralism of viewpoints or identifying other synergistic, transdisciplinary, and separation approaches can help manage these tensions. This study confirms the critical issues of benefit sharing within TFCAs, providing insights that can inform equitable management strategies through direct democratic processes. Additionally, it highlights the intra- and inter-community heterogeneity of perspectives, contributing to broader debates on the effectiveness of TFCAs

Business · Economic growth · Economics · Empowerment · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Natural resource economics · Political science · Computer Science · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Local Economic Development and Planning

  • Tourism market share reconfiguration in Kaza TFCA

    Open Access•Dandy Badimo, Dimpho Malebogo Matlhola•Development Southern Africa•2026

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae