Practical use of full-spectrum sustainability in the Bay of Fundy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4239875 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Owen P Jones (University of New Brunswick), Robert L Stephenson (0000-0002-1207-1063, University of New Brunswick) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Publication date | 2019-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Conservation Ecology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1195-5449 • E-ISSN: 1708-3087 |
| Publisher | Resilience Alliance (PUBLISHER • CA) |
| DOI | 10.5751/es-11010-240325 |
| OpenAlex | W2971725812 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 10 |
It is increasingly recognized that sustainability is composed of four key components: environmental, economic, social (including cultural), and institutional (or governance). Fisheries and coastal management systems, however, are heavily weighted toward biophysical and ecological aspects, thus leaving the "human dimension," i.e., social, economic, and institutional, relatively neglected. Full-spectrum sustainability (FSS) is an approach to resource management that aims to address this imbalance. Management plans are beginning to include elements of FSS, yet there are very few practical examples of successfully implemented FSS strategies. We examined and compared the potential application of two proposed FSS frameworks in the Bay of Fundy, one based on the Southwest New Brunswick Marine Advisory Committee Community Values Criteria, and the other on the Framework for Comprehensive Evaluation from the Canadian Fisheries Research Network. These were compared in structure and in their practical application to evaluation of plans for herring (Clupea harengus) management and the recovery of the North Atlantic right whale (Eubalena glacialis) in the Maritime region of Canada. Although the two frameworks differ in specific structure, both frameworks are useful in demonstrating the strengths and weaknesses of current management plans. This evaluation demonstrates that the management plans are strong in attention to ecological objectives but have gaps in the spectrum of considerations in current management planning, especially in relation to social, economic, and governance considerations. We propose that FSS frameworks can provide and should be used routinely as the basis for analysis of policies and management plans, engagement and discussion among stakeholders in participatory governance, comparison of alternative management scenarios, and the generation of advice. Use of FSS frameworks will allow better decisions on coastal activities within the context of "balanced" FSS
Business · Citizen journalism · Corporate governance · Economics · Ecosystem · Ecosystem-Based Management · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Fisheries management · Fishery · Fishing · Geography · Marine protected area · Political science · Sustainability · Coastal and Marine Management · Computer Science · Marine and fisheries research · Marine animal studies overview · Ecology
Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries
Global sustainability
How to understand and measure environmental sustainability
Key principles of marine ecosystem-based management
Towards sustainability
Sustainability
Emerging frontiers in social-ecological systems research for sustainability of small-scale fisheries
Social–ecological dynamism, knowledge, and sustainable coastal marine fisheries
Poverty, sustainability and human wellbeing
Alternative environmentalities
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2020 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |