A Criticism of Two Recent Attempts to Scale Glock and Stark's Dimensions of Religiosity
A Research Note
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4264647 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James O Gibbs, Kelly W Crader |
| Year | 1970 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 107 |
| Publication date | 1970-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sociological Analysis (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0038-0210 • E-ISSN: 2325-7873 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/3710060 |
| OpenAlex | W2542975651 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 4 |
The purpose of this paper is to criticize recent attempts to Guttman scale the five Glock-Stark dimensions of religiosity. In addition to criticizing some aspects of the existing work, additional data and scales are presented
Art · Cartography · Criticism · Geography · Literature · Psychoanalysis · Religiosity · Scale (ratio) · Sociology · Psychology · Religion and Society Interactions · Religion, Society, and Development · Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology · Social Psychology
Religious human capital revisited
Social Correlates of Spiritual Maturity among North American Mennonites
Intimacy and Saliency
On Being Religious
Religiosity and Premarital Sexual Permissiveness
The Five Dimensions of Religiosity
Religiosity and Prejudice
The measure of Chinese religions
The Local-Cosmopolitan Orientation and Traditional Religious Commitment
Religiosity in youth
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,18 |
| Citation span | 1970 - 2020 (51) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |