Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Hermeneutic Significance of Auerbach's Ansatz

Bibliographic Data

ID4270682
AuthorsW Wolfgang Holdheim (corresponding author)
Year1985
Volume16
Issue3
Pages627
Publication date1985-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueNew Literary History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0028-6087 • E-ISSN: 1080-661X
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/468844
OpenAlexW2320726650
LanguageEN
Citations received4

I WANT TO FOCUS on central notion in Erich Auerbach's critical practice and concomitant theoretical self-reflection: on that concrete and well-defined key problem (often literary passage) which serves him literary-historical analysis. He calls it Ansatz, and no single English term could possibly convey the multifariously refracted shades meaning that the German word (together with its corresponding verb, ansetzen) suggests. Their exhaustive investigation would take me beyond reasonable limits. But selective to-and-fro between some those shadings and Auerbach's statements on the matter, seen against the horizon his practice, may carry cumulative suggestion what this critic may mean to us today. I have already cited the most obvious translation: point departure (or, perhaps, of initiation). For all its schematic paucity, this term has the implication expanding, going beyond. In the original, this implication is much stronger: Ansatz is also addition or appendage; ansetzen carries the nuance thriving, growing, even gaining weight. Especially growing: the process is not mechanical but temporal, denotes development from the potential to the actual, natural expansion the part into the whole. Auerbach likes to intensify this aspect by using metaphor radiation: the Ansatz must radiate, that world history can be carried on from its basis [von ihm aus].' The whole is potentially contained in the part; the part is a partial phenomenon describable with technical-philological that permits synthesizing unfolding the totality, until the radiating light as it were illuminates an entire historical landscape.2 Let us note that the characteristic particularity the Ansatz is by no means schematic and arbitrary individuation but genuine given concreteness and thus temporal concrescence, growing together various strands within the process time. But the whole, though it is in the part, is approachable only through the part, in aspects and nuances. Ansatz also implies arrangement, further disposition or tendency, and finally almost attack. It is (thus Auerbach) so to speak handle that permits one to attack the

Ansatz · Epistemology · Psychoanalysis · Critical Theory and Political Philosophy · Mathematical Physics · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Os limites do exotismo

    Open Access•L F Sobral•Novos Estudos - CEBRAP•2018

  • The Periphery of Literature

    Gian-Paolo Biasin•Modern Language Notes•1996

  • Erich Auerbach y el humanismo goetheano

    Open Access•Alejandro López Lizana•452oF. Revista de Teoría de la…•2026

  • Said, Auerbach, and the Return to Philological Hermeneutics

    Evgenia Ilieva•The European Legacy•2020

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,13
Citation span1996 - 2026 (31)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae