Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Obama, Congress, and Audience Costs

Shifting the Blame on the Red Line

Bibliographic Data

ID4287761
AuthorsSarah Burns (0000-0002-0676-3653, Apple (Israel)), Andrew Stravers (Institute for Security Studies)
Year2020
Volume135
Issue1
Pages67-101
Publication date2020-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Science Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0032-3195 • E-ISSN: 1538-165X
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1002/polq.12997
OpenAlexW3011697390
LanguageEN
Citations received3

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA ENTERED OFFICE vowing to draw down two wars and revive America’s image abroad. In light of these assertions, his decision to initiate hostilities against Muammar el-Qaddafi in 2011 without congressional authorization took many by surprise. Obama argued the United States had a unique ability to spearhead the operation and a Responsibility to Protect (R2P) the people of Libya. He expressed no qualms about sidestepping Congress, offering only ambivalence about the benefit of—not the need for—congressional support. In Congress, his unilateralism “raised all sorts of hackles” that came to very little. Obama’s actions received a “veneer of outrage” followed by “the collective message... of supplication,” giving him every reason to assume he could act the same way in the future.1 Changing course in 2013, Obama asked Congress to provide an Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) against the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad in similar circumstances. In contrast to his actions on the civil war in Libya, Obama justified this decision by claiming the use of chemical weapons did not require a quick response. While many praised his decision to acknowledge Congress’s coequal status, the contrasting rhetoric and actions raise a number of questions

Blame · Citation · Library science · Media studies · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Academic Freedom and Politics · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Bipartisanship and US Foreign Policy

    Jordan Tama•Bipartisanship and US Foreign…•2023

  • Legalizing a Political Fight

    Open Access•Sarah Burns•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2021

  • Trade Rage

    Open Access•Don Casler, Richard Clark•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2021

Citations per year0.6
Citation span2021 - 2023 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae