The Making of the New Democrats
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4287975 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jon F Hale (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1995 |
| Volume | 110 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 207-232 |
| Publication date | 1995-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Political Science Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0032-3195 • E-ISSN: 1538-165X |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2152360 |
| OpenAlex | W2315810200 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 32 |
In 1992, Democratic party was presented to Americans as Bill Clinton captured the party's nomination and won the presidency. Clinton's oft-made assertion that he was a different kind of was meant to suggest to voters centrist candidate more attuned than his immediate predecessors to the concerns and values of the white, middle-class voters who had deserted the party in its losing presidential campaigns in the 1980s. The prominent use of the phrases and a different kind of by the Clinton campaign gave clear indication of its perception that the preexisting identity of the national Democratic party was handicap that needed to be overcome for Bill Clinton to be elected president. Clinton did not want to be regarded as Democrat in the line of Michael Dukakis, Walter Mondale, Jimmy Carter, and George McGovern. The New Democrat rhetoric, however, was not simply campaign rhetoric concocted by Clinton's coterie of talented campaign strategists. It stood for substantively new Democratic approach to active government that had been developing since the early years of the Reagan administration. The story of the New Democrats is, in large part, the story of the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC), an unofficial party organization of elected Democrats put together by political entrepreneur in 1985. The DLC's objective was to move the national Democratic party, in both perception and substance, toward the center of the political spectrum in order to break the Republican hold on the White House. Over time, the DLC gained the institutional capacity to draw prominent Democratic politicians into its sphere and to develop centrist alternative for the party. Had it not been for the institutional success of the DLC, the New Democratic message would not have been articulated and Bill Clinton would have been considerably less appealing and probably less successful candidate for president.I
Political economy · Political science · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Public Administration
Party Factions in Congress
The Arc of Neoliberalism
Like as My Profile”
Third way social policy
Modern Challenges to the Welfare State and the Antecedents of the Third Way
European Center-Lefts and the Mazes of European Integration
Once Again a Model
Historical Decline or Change of Scale?
The myth of the business friendly economy
The story of America
The Reagan Democrat Phenomenon
Clinton's Domestic Policy Makers
Swing Issues and Policy Regimes
Finding the Third Way
Unilateralism as a Strategic Public Relations Tool
Introduction
Introduction
Welcoming Their Hatred
The Social Policies Presidents Make
The Anger Gap
Retreating from Redistribution? Trends in Democratic Party Fidelity to Economic Equality, 1984–2020
A coalition approach to trade policymaking in the United States
The Politics Insurgents Make
The Development of an Anglo-American Model of Trade Union and Political Party Relations
What's Left of Leftism
Voter Migration and the Geographic Sorting of the American Electorate
Progressive Policy Making in a Conservative Age? Civil Rights and the Politics of Federal Education Standards, Testing, and Accountability
The Changing Party of the Institutional Revolution
Old Democrats in New Clothing
Moderate Caucuses in a Polarised US Congress
What is neo-liberalism
The Transformation of America's Penal Order
| Unique citing works | 32 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,14 |
| Citation span | 1998 - 2025 (28) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 29 |