Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

When the cat is away, the mice will play

The political ecology of tobacco production and manganese mining in Nansanga farm block in Zambia

Bibliographic Data

ID4301685
AuthorsAndrew Chilombo (0000-0002-6820-9287, UNEP West Africa sub-Regional Office, corresponding author), Dan Van Der Horst (0000-0002-9454-9664, University of Edinburgh)
Year2021
Volume28
Issue1
Publication date2021-08-24
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Political Ecology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1073-0451 • E-ISSN: 1073-0451
PublisherUniversity of Arizona (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2458/jpe.2974
OpenAlexW3195732376
LanguageEN
References cited30

Large-scale land acquisitions (LSLAs) have emerged as an important policy issue in development discourse. Governments in host countries play a critical role in engineering policy landscapes for enclosing local community resources for capital accumulation by business entities with more financial resources and access to power. Case studies have highlighted failed implementation of LSLA deals, resulting in cancellations, scaling down, abandonment or change of investment business models. However, few attempts have been made to understand what accounts for such failures and what happens when both state policy and private sector implementation of land deals fail. Taking Nansanga farm block, a government of Zambia-led LSLA deal currently in limbo, this article presents a study that aimed at understanding the political ecology of tobacco production and manganese mining as opportunistic economic activities - that is, activities that are taking advantage of new infrastructure created by an otherwise 'failed' government project and flourishing in an area where local people's rights were previously protected through customary tenure. Drawing on stakeholder interviews, the study shows that the government's role in the development of Nansanga vanished; creating a development vacuum that opened the door to opportunistic tobacco production and open pit manganese mining. Tobacco and mining, heavily extractive as they are of forest resources, have emerged as double-edged swords: in the short term increasing financial inflows and job creation on one hand, and, on the other, leading to flight from production of traditional crops, deforestation and land degradation, anomie and deracination as some land use and land users are (re)defined

Agriculture · Appropriation · Business · Economics · Land grabbing · Natural resource economics · Political ecology · Political science · Politics · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · Land Rights and Reforms · Mining and Resource Management · Ecology

  • Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment

    Open Access•Murphy Murphy, Robert Dingwall et al.•Health Technology Assessment•1998

  • Sampling hard to reach populations

    Open Access•Jean Faugier, Mary Sargeant•Journal of Advanced Nursing•1997

  • An Empirical Comparison of Respondent-driven Sampling, Time Location Sampling, and Snowball Sampling for Behavioral Surveillance in Men Who Have Sex with Men, Fortaleza, Brazil

    Open Access•C Kendall, Ligia Regina Sansigolo Kerr et al.•AIDS and Behavior•2008

  • Global assessment of deforestation related to tobacco farming

    Hannes Geist, H J Geist•Tobacco Control•1999

  • The miombo ecoregion up in smoke

    Open Access•Luke Jimu, Loritah Mataruse et al.•World Development Perspectives•2017

  • Social-ecological outcomes of agricultural intensification

    Open Access•Laura Vang Rasmussen, Brendan Coolsaet et al.•Nature Sustainability•2018

  • Policy coherence and interplay between Zambia’s forest, energy, agricultural and climate change policies and multilateral environmental agreements

    Open Access•Felix Kanungwe Kalaba, Claire H Quinn et al.•International Environmental…•2013

  • The Evolution of Environment-Conflict Research

    Tom Deligiannis•Global Environmental Politics•2012

  • Political ecology

    Open Access•Peter A Walker•Progress in Human Geography•2006

  • Land pressures, the evolution of farming systems, and development strategies in Africa

    Open Access•T S Jayne, Judith Chamberlin et al.•Food Policy•2014

  • Land Tenure, Fixed Investment, and Farm Productivity

    Open Access•R E F Smith, Robert E Smith•World Development•2004

  • The Rise of Large Farms in Land Abundant Countries

    Open Access•Klaus Deininger, Derek Byerlee•World Development•2012

  • The geography of Zambia’s customary land

    Open Access•Nicholas J Sitko, Judith Chamberlin•Land Use Policy•2016

  • A conceptual framework for improving the understanding of large scale land acquisitions

    Open Access•Andrew Chilombo, Janet Fisher et al.•Land Use Policy•2019

  • Contribution of forest provisioning ecosystem services to rural livelihoods in the Miombo woodlands of Zambia

    Open Access•Felix Kanungwe Kalaba, Claire H Quinn et al.•Population and Environment•2013

  • Large-scale land acquisitions, state authority and indigenous local communities

    Open Access•Tsegaye Moreda•Third World Quarterly•2017

  • Land Grabbing, Large- and Small-scale Farming

    Elena Baglioni, Peter Gibbon•Third World Quarterly•2013

  • The 2013 Antipode AAG Lecture The Environment Making State

    Open Access•Christian Parenti•Antipode•2015

  • Host country governance and the African land rush

    Open Access•George C Schoneveld•Geoforum•2016

  • What is land? Assembling a resource for global investment

    Open Access•Tania Murray Li•Transactions of the Institute of…•2014

  • The qualitative research interview

    Open Access•Barbara Dicicco-Bloom, Barbara DiCicco‐Bloom et al.•Medical Education•2006

  • Property rights and large-scale mining

    Katz-Lavigne, Sarah Katz-Lavigne•Third World Thematics A TWQ Journal•2016

  • Governing Global Land Deals

    Open Access•W Wolford, Saturnino M Borras Jr et al.•Development and Change•2013

  • Global Land Grabbing and Trajectories of Agrarian Change

    Open Access•Saturnino M Borras Jr, Jennifer C Franco•Journal of Agrarian Change•2012

  • Customary vs Private Property Rights? Dynamics and Trajectories of Vernacular Land Markets in Sub-Saharan Africa

    Open Access•Admos Chimhowu, Phil Woodhouse•Journal of Agrarian Change•2006

  • Land and agricultural commercialisation in Meru County, Kenya

    Cyriaque Hakizimana, Paul Goldsmith et al.•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2017

  • Land grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean

    Saturnino M Borras Jr, Saturnino M Borra et al.•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2012

  • The land grab and corporate food regime restructuring

    Philip Mcmichael•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2012

  • Centering labor in the land grab debate

    Tania Murray Li•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2011

  • How not to think of land-grabbing

    Olivier De Schutter•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2011

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae