Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Performance Assessment of Teaching

Implications for Teacher Education

Bibliographic Data

ID4309870
AuthorsStephanie L Knight (0000-0001-6771-1147, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA), Gwendolyn M Lloyd (0000-0001-9477-782X, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA), Fran Arbaugh (0000-0002-7271-0015, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA), David Gamson (The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA), David A Gamson (Pennsylvania State University), Scott P Mcdonald (The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA), Scott Mcdonald (0000-0001-9887-7481, Pennsylvania State University), James Nolan (0000-0002-1273-8163, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA), Anne Elrod Whitney (0000-0002-9574-7320, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA)
Year2014
Volume65
Issue5
Pages372-374
Publication date2014-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Teacher Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-4871 • E-ISSN: 1552-7816
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0022487114550475
OpenAlexW2159840988
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited4

Recent challenges concerning the quality of teachers and the programs that prepare them have resulted in responses from professional organizations that have been more widespread and intense than in the past (Robinson, 2011; Wiseman, 2012). The Blue Ribbon Panel on Clinical Preparation (BRP) formed by the National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE), the merger of NCATE and Teacher Education Accreditation Council (TEAC) into Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) to improve teacher education (Cibulka, 2011), and the Teacher Performance Assessment Initiative which emerged from collaboration between the Performance Assessment for California Teachers (PACT), the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS), and American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE) member institutions (Robinson, 2011) are examples of ways that professional organizations have responded to the challenges. In general, calls for performance assessments of teaching to provide both formative and summative information about the quality of teachers, teacher candidates, and teacher preparation programs pervade the current discourse on education at every level, including schools and districts, institutions of higher education, state and national policymaking entities, and professional organizations. As a result, a number of performance assessments have emerged that can provide feedback to teacher education programs about the strengths and weaknesses of their candidates as well as evidence for licensure and certification of teachers. For example, Education Teacher Performance Assessment (edTPA) was designed to provide information for program improvement through the use of a common set of performance assessments for preservice teachers and has also been adopted by states and districts for summative evaluation purposes (http://edtpa.aacte.org/). The multiple performance measures in systems like edTPA improve upon value added models (VAM) by providing information on teaching quality, not just teacher quality or teacher effectiveness, and provide information sooner than might be accomplished by use of VAM alone (Newton, 2010). For this theme issue, we invited research and conceptual articles related to teacher performance assessments specifically as they affect teacher education, including validation studies of measures used in the assessments. We posed a series of questions that we considered important for researchers to address related to performance assessments, including the following: What are the relationships between current performance assessments and teacher education, either conceptually or in terms of outcomes? What do we know about the use of performance assessments in the context of teacher education, and what do we need to know? How do performance assessments of teachers in schools map onto assessment of teacher education programs, or how don't they? What differences may exist across novice teachers and expert teachers with respect to performance assessment, and how does that impact their professional learning? What are the implications of the relationships between for-profit companies, university teacher education programs, researchers, states, and professional organizations with respect to performance assessments of teachers? What is the relationship between assessment criteria and the research on teaching and learning, and what are its implications for teacher education? How do states make decisions to move to statewide teacher assessment systems? What potential conflicts of interest may exist among various stakeholders in performance assessment efforts? How do policies related to performance assessment of teachers affect opportunities for teacher learning? What can we learn from the history of past efforts to evaluate beginning teachers? What is different this time? What do we know about the validity and reliability of performance assessments and why does this matter

Accountability · Accreditation · Certification · Formative assessment · Licensure · Mathematics education · Medical education · Pedagogy · Political science · Professional development · Summative assessment · Teacher education · Educational Assessment and Improvement · Medicine · Psychology · Teacher Education and Assessments · Teacher Education and Leadership Studies

  • Exploring candidate interaction with a high stakes teacher performance assessment

    Open Access•Connor K Warner•Education Policy Analysis Archives•2020

  • Quality of Feedback in Higher Education

    Open Access•Kathryn Haughney, Shawnee Wakeman et al.•Education Sciences•2020

  • The Preservice Teacher Competency Performance Scale

    Tara Putnam, Maria Newton et al.•Journal of Physical Education…•2021

  • Navigating Mandates and Working toward Coherence

    Connor K Warner, Clare V Bell et al.•The Educational Forum•2020

  • Comparing the reliability of performance task scores obtained from rating scale and analytic rubric using the generalizability theory

    Open Access•Funda Nalbantoğlu Yılmaz•Studies In Educational Evaluation•2024

  • Disentangling the relationship between institutional influence, transformational leadership and performance in higher educational institutions in India

    Leema Rose Victor, Mariadoss Siluvaimuthu et al.•International Journal of…•2025

  • Preservice Teachers' Mathematics Teaching Competence

    Open Access•Rossella Santagata, Judith Haymore Sandholtz•Journal of Teacher Education•2019

  • Investigating the Impact of edTPA Professional Development on Classroom Practice and Student Teaching Experience

    Open Access•Scott Kissau, Laura C Hart et al.•Journal of Teacher Education•2019

  • Taking Stock in 2015

    Open Access•Stephanie L Knight, Gwendolyn M Lloyd et al.•Journal of Teacher Education•2015

  • Teachers’ Professional Development in a Climate of Educational Reform

    Open Access•Judith Warren Little•Educational Evaluation and Policy…•1993

  • Wrinkles in Time and Place

    Open Access•Suzanne M Wilson, Sam Wineburg et al.•American Educational Research…•1993

  • Jte

    Open Access•Sharon P Robinson•Journal of Teacher Education•2011

  • The Intersection of Policy, Reform, and Teacher Education

    Open Access•Donna L Wiseman•Journal of Teacher Education•2012

Unique citing works9
Citations per year0,82
Citation span2015 - 2025 (11)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae