Emerging Adult Religiosity and Spirituality

Linking Beliefs, Values, and Ethical Decision-Making

Bibliographic Data

ID4314280
AuthorsPatricia Snell Herzog (0000-0001-6231-1371, University of Arkansas at Fayetteville, corresponding author), De Beadle, De Andre’ T Beadle (University of Minnesota)
Year2018
Volume9
Issue3
Pages84
Publication date2018-03-16
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueReligions (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/rel9030084
OpenAlexW2794344368
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited20

This paper challenges the "spiritual but not religious" (SBNR) category as a methodological artifact caused by interacting two closed-ended survey items into binary combinations. Employing a theoretically rich approach, this study maps the multiple ways in which the religious and the spiritual combine for emerging adults. Results indicate that most emerging adults have a tacit sense of morality, displaying limited cognitive access to how moral reasoning relates to religious and spiritual orientations. This longitudinal study investigates efforts to raise moral awareness through: exposure to diverse religious and spiritual orientations, personal reflection, and collective discussion. Relative to control groups, emerging adults in this study display increases in moral awareness. We combine the results of these studies to formulate a theoretical framework for the ways in which beliefs, values, and ethical decision-making connect in expressing plural combinations of religiosity and spirituality. The implication is that direct attention to religiosity and spirituality - not avoidance of - appears to facilitate ethical decision-making

Cognition · Epistemology · Morality · Religiosity · Spirituality · Psychology · Religion and Society Interactions · Religion, Society, and Development · Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access