Modernity and colonialism
On the Historical-Sociological Blindness of the Theories of Modernity
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4324075 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ademir Bavaresco (0000-0002-7967-4109, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul), Agemir Bavaresco, Leno Francisco Danner (0000-0002-2332-3182, Universidade Federal de Rondônia), Fernando Danner (0000-0002-4541-1204, Universidad Internacional De La Rioja) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 17-47 |
| Publication date | 2017-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sofia (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2317-2339 • E-ISSN: 2317-2339 |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.47456/sofia.v6i1.16070 |
| OpenAlex | W4285024330 |
| Language | EN |
This paper criticizes the historical-sociological blindness found in contemporary theories of modernity (as in those of Weber and Habermas) in order both to construct a sociological model for the process of Western modernization and to formulate a normative notion of cultural modernity which can favor the development of a critical social theory which is correlatively sociological and philosophical. The historical-sociological blindness regarding the theoretical-political reconstruction of the process of Western modernization is basically characterized by the separation between European cultural modernity and European social-economic modernization, which leads to the notion that European culture is not directly linked to social and economic modernization. Likewise, Western modernization is fundamentally an autonomous and endogenous constitutive process, bearing no correlation with other cultures-societies, as seen in the lack of references to the fact of colonialism. Such a separation between culture and social systems or institutions results in European cultural modernity becoming a pure normative concept with no direct relations to both social and economic modernization and colonialism. That is the reason why, according to Habermas, a critical and universalistic normative concept both to a critical social theory and its political praxis, as to international politics, is allowed. The central argument of this paper is that the theories of modernity cannot provide a normative paradigm to a critical social theory based on cultural modernity due to this historical-sociological blindness. Therefore, the elaboration of a normative concept for critical social theory should start by unveiling, denouncing and deconstructing the historical-sociological blindness of these contemporary theories of modernity
Critical theory · Epistemology · Modernity · Modernization theory · Normative · Political science · Politics · Social science · Social theory · Sociological theory · Sociology · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Law · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |