Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Modernity and colonialism

On the Historical-Sociological Blindness of the Theories of Modernity

Bibliographic Data

ID4324075
AuthorsAdemir Bavaresco (0000-0002-7967-4109, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul), Agemir Bavaresco, Leno Francisco Danner (0000-0002-2332-3182, Universidade Federal de Rondônia), Fernando Danner (0000-0002-4541-1204, Universidad Internacional De La Rioja)
Year2017
Volume6
Issue1
Pages17-47
Publication date2017-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSofia (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2317-2339 • E-ISSN: 2317-2339
PublisherUniversidade Federal do Espirito Santo (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.47456/sofia.v6i1.16070
OpenAlexW4285024330
LanguageEN

This paper criticizes the historical-sociological blindness found in contemporary theories of modernity (as in those of Weber and Habermas) in order both to construct a sociological model for the process of Western modernization and to formulate a normative notion of cultural modernity which can favor the development of a critical social theory which is correlatively sociological and philosophical. The historical-sociological blindness regarding the theoretical-political reconstruction of the process of Western modernization is basically characterized by the separation between European cultural modernity and European social-economic modernization, which leads to the notion that European culture is not directly linked to social and economic modernization. Likewise, Western modernization is fundamentally an autonomous and endogenous constitutive process, bearing no correlation with other cultures-societies, as seen in the lack of references to the fact of colonialism. Such a separation between culture and social systems or institutions results in European cultural modernity becoming a pure normative concept with no direct relations to both social and economic modernization and colonialism. That is the reason why, according to Habermas, a critical and universalistic normative concept both to a critical social theory and its political praxis, as to international politics, is allowed. The central argument of this paper is that the theories of modernity cannot provide a normative paradigm to a critical social theory based on cultural modernity due to this historical-sociological blindness. Therefore, the elaboration of a normative concept for critical social theory should start by unveiling, denouncing and deconstructing the historical-sociological blindness of these contemporary theories of modernity

Critical theory · Epistemology · Modernity · Modernization theory · Normative · Political science · Politics · Social science · Social theory · Sociological theory · Sociology · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Law · Philosophy

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae