Discourse Theory and Performance-Based Assessment
Two Tools for Professional Interpreting
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4343670 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andrew Clifford (University of Ottawa, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 365-378 |
| Publication date | 2002-10-02 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Meta Journal des traducteurs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0026-0452 • E-ISSN: 1492-1421 |
| Publisher | Consortium Erudit (PUBLISHER • CA) |
| DOI | 10.7202/002345ar |
| OpenAlex | W2114804550 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 2 |
This article examines interpreter assessment and draws attention to the limits of a lexico-semantic approach. It proposes using features of discourse theory to identify some of the competencies needed to interpret and suggests developing assessment instruments with the technical rigour common in other fields. The author gives examples of discursive features in interpretation and shows how these elements might be used to construct a rubric for assessing interpreter performance
Construct (python library) · Epistemology · Interpretation (philosophy) · Interpreter · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Natural language processing · Programming language · Rigour · Rubric · Computer Science · Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare · linguistics and terminology studies · Psychology
Insights Into Challenges Faced by Interpreting Trainees and Their Error Patterns
Neural network models vs. MT evaluation metrics
Mapping interpreting studies
Developing an analytic scale for assessing undergraduate students’ consecutive interpreting performances
Using rating scales to assess interpretation
Réflexions d’un praticien sur une étape de la formation des interprètes de conférence
| Citations per year | 0.29 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2005 - 2026 (22) |
| Highly cited | No |