Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

I am directed to remind you of your duty to your familyrsquo

Public surveillance of mothering in Victoria, Australia, 1920-40

Bibliographic Data

ID4349147
AuthorsSwain Shurlee, Shurlee Swain (0000-0002-9193-2086, Australian Catholic University, corresponding author)
Year1999
Volume8
Issue2
Pages247-259
Publication date1999-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueWomen s History Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0961-2025 • E-ISSN: 1747-583X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09612029900200418
PMID22619780
OpenAlexW2070730805
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited3

Historical interest in the Societies for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, founded in the late nineteenth century, has seldom extended beyond the excitement of their early crusading years.This article, based on an analysis of the records of the one surviving Australian branch of the Society, focuses instead on the inter-war era, showing how it found a role as the disciplinary wing of a broad-based, conservative, philanthropic alliance which identified child welfare as central to the nation-building process.Its definition of good parenting was, however, a gendered one, privileging husbands at the expense of their wives and ignoring economic failure as a cause of children's distress.The historiography of the Societies for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (SPCC) tends to focus on their early 'heroic' period, the last quarter of the nineteenth century when campaigners used the three-pronged approach of 'legislative action, wrenching propaganda and organisational growth', to define and enforce a new standard of acceptable/idealised childhood.[1]By this process both the New York SPCC, founded in 1875, and the more famous National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC), which consolidated the work of 31 English committees under one umbrella in 1889, had distinguished themselves from earlier child-saving movements, successfully arguing for a definition of child cruelty which was independent of morality and social class.In the first half of the twentieth century, when surviving societies around the world settled into what was essentially a disciplinary role, historians tend to lose interest, returning only briefly to seek to explain why the SPCCs were caught short by the 'rediscovery' of child abuse in the post-World War Two years.In the intervening period, historians agree, the focus of SPCC investigations shifted from cruelty to

Alliance · Criminology · Cruelty · Discipline · Distress · Duty · Political science · Sociology · Welfare · Australian History and Society · Canadian Identity and History · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · History · Law · Psychology

  • Returning to our roots

    Sandra Bern, Sandra Berns•Australian Feminist Law Journal•2002

  • Yesterday's Men

    Gary Clapton•The British Journal of Social Work•2009

  • The Disenchantment of the Home

    Kerreen Reiger•The Disenchantment of the Home•1986

  • Childbearers as rights-bearers

    Marilyn Lake•Women s History Review•1999

  • The Social History of Social Policy

    Open Access•Jane Lewis•Journal of Social Policy•1980

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,13
Citation span2002 - 2009 (8)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae