Self-denigration in Chinese
An interactional speech act approach
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4359342 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dániel Z Kádár (0000-0002-7238-730X, Dalian University of Foreign Languages), J House (0000-0003-2650-1404, Universität Hamburg), Fengguang Liu (0009-0005-3153-8756, Dalian University of Foreign Languages), Lin Jiao (0009-0008-4280-2809, Dalian University of Foreign Languages, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 88 |
| Pages | 153-167 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Language & Communication (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0271-5309 • E-ISSN: 1873-3395 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.langcom.2022.11.008 |
| OpenAlex | W4313531134 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 14 |
| References cited | 28 |
In this study, we investigate self-denigration in Chinese by applying a strictly language-based interactional speech act approach. Previous research has often zeroed in on Chinese self-denigration by studying the pragmatic function of expressions selected beforehand by the researcher. As an alternative, we propose a bottom-up approach through which self-denigration can be captured in phases of interaction and expressions speech acts and expressions embedded in these phases. Our corpus consists of dialogues drawn from Chinese novels written between the 14th and 20th centuries. As our analysis shows, self-denigration often serves smoothening the flow of interaction and mimimising offence, along with expressing deference. Furthermore, self-denigration is more frequented in goal-oriented interactions than in ceremonial ones. Our results also contribute to previous discussions relating to Ide's (1989) renowned notion of 'discernment
Deference · Function (biology · Linguistics · Speech act · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Multilingual Education and Policy · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
Cak Lontong's Humorous Discourse on Youtube Media in Pragmatic Perspective
Online Self-Praise and Self-Denigration as Used by Young People in Jordan
Expressions of gratitude
Chinese as a historical diplomatic language
Pragmatics of irony in performance
Managing modesty through self-denigration in Omani online interaction
The evolution of research articles on self-denigration
Flattery in historical China
Tailoring language to social hierarchies
Voices From the Void
Force dynamics of (im)politeness
Chinese thanking interaction from premodern to modern China
Revisiting respect and politeness
Also on humblebragging
Interaction Ritual
Pragmatics across Languages and Cultures
Greeting in English as a Foreign Language
Chinese females׳ date refusals in reality TV shows
On historical Chinese apology and its strategic application
Keqi (客气) in historical Chinese
Balancing obligations
Historical Chinese politeness and rhetoric. A case study of epistolary refusals
Self-Denigration in 21 st Century Chinese
Reconstructing the Politeness Principle in Chinese
Teaching and assessing L2 pragmatics
Speech acts and interaction in second language pragmatics
A contrastive study of compliment responses among Australian English and Mandarin Chinese speakers
Formal forms and discernment
Self-denigration in Mandarin Chinese
Self-denigration as a relational strategy in lingua franca talk
From bonding to biting
About face
Responding to compliments A contrastive study of politeness strategies between American English and Chinese speakers
Interaction Ritual and (Im)Politeness
Re-examining politeness, face and the Japanese language
What is in a greeting? The social meaning of greetings in Sweden-Swedish and Finland-Swedish service encounters
L2 pragmatics as 'intercultural pragmatics
Linguistic rituals for thanking in Japanese
Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese
Situational Meanings of Japanese Social Deixis
| Unique citing works | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 14 |