Seul comme Benveniste ou comment la critique manque de style
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4384747 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Henri Meschonnic |
| Year | 1995 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 118 |
| Pages | 31-55 |
| Publication date | 1995-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Langages (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0458-726X • E-ISSN: 1958-9549 |
| Publisher | PERSEE Program (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3406/lgge.1995.1713 |
| OpenAlex | W1974636975 |
| Language | FR |
| Citations received | 3 |
Henri Meschonnic : How criticism lacks style Benveniste is famous but misread. His style, his manner, the specific rhythm of his discourse are not perceived with all their critical dimension. For example, the philological point of view chosen by C. Dalimier to prove that « platonicien » definition of rhythm does exist before Plato, despite Benveniste, overlooks the essential of what he actually says. Stylistice has to be critical or not to be
Art · Criticism · Dimension (graph theory · Epistemology · Feminism · Humanities · Literature · Philology · Sociology · Style (visual arts · Historical and Literary Studies · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,1 |
| Citation span | 1995 - 2023 (29) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |