Trust or Illusion in YouTube News? Perspectives on Media Reliability Across Generations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4388324 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yasemin Bilişli (0000-0001-9272-9568, Department of Office Services and Secretariat Social Sciences Vocational School Akdeniz University Antalya Türkiye, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 76 |
| Issue | 259 |
| Pages | 179-194 |
| Publication date | 2025-07-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Social Science Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-8701 • E-ISSN: 1468-2451 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/issj.12592 |
| OpenAlex | W4412009909 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 31 |
The rapid development of internet technologies has transformed society, facilitating access to information while amplifying challenges like the spread of misinformation. As one of the most widely used video-sharing platforms, YouTube has increasingly drawn scholarly attention for its potential role in the dissemination of misleading or manipulative content, including misinformation and disinformation, particularly in the absence of editorial oversight. Conducted in Türkiye, this study investigates how different generational cohorts (Generations X, Y and Z) perceive and consume YouTube news, focusing on media reliability, verification strategies and attitudes toward misinformation. The study involved 30 participants (10 from each generation), selected through purposive and snowball sampling, all of whom actively use YouTube as a news source. This study examines the interplay between generational differences and digital media habits to provide a nuanced understanding of the evolving dynamics of news consumption, thereby addressing a critical gap in the literature. This qualitative study employed semi-structured interviews, which were thematically analysed using MAXQDA Analytics Pro 2022 to explore generational distinctions in news trust, verification and misinformation attitudes. Although Generation X relies on traditional media and institutional credibility, Generation Y adopts a hybrid approach that blends digital and traditional tools for cross-referencing. In contrast, Generation Z prioritizes social media and peer networks, placing greater value on speed and interactivity over institutional authority. The findings suggest that media literacy programs should be tailored to generational needs, incorporating platform-specific guidance and verification skills to improve resilience against misinformation. By highlighting generational dynamics in YouTube news consumption, the study contributes valuable insights into designing strategies for fostering media literacy and promoting accurate information dissemination in the digital age
Advertising · Business · Cognitive psychology · Illusion · Internet privacy · Media studies · Media use · Multimedia · News media · Political science · Reliability (semiconductor) · Social media · Sociology · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Media Influence and Politics · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
The qualitative research interview
Digital Inequality
Elderly Forgotten? Digital Exclusion in the Information Age and the Rising Grey Digital Divide
Misinformation, disinformation, and violent conflict
Case Study Research
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (Coreq)
Defining “Fake News”
Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 2
Are We There Yet? Data Saturation in Qualitative Research
Qualitative Case Study Methodology
With Facebook, Blogs, and Fake News, Teens Reject Journalistic “Objectivity”
The media and the literacies
Difference and diversity
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Navigating cross-media news use
Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
Understanding media
Digital Media Literacies
Media Literacy and the Challenge of New Information and Communication Technologies
Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
Spreadable Spectacle in Digital Culture
How Many Interviews Are Enough
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |