The visual environment and attention in decision making
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4421093 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jacob Lund Orquin (0000-0001-9835-5835, corresponding author), Erik Stoltenberg Lahm (0000-0002-0203-7152), Hrvoje Stojić (0000-0002-9699-9052) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 147 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 597-617 |
| Publication date | 2021-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychological Bulletin (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-2909 • E-ISSN: 1939-1455 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037/bul0000328 |
| PMID | 34843300 |
| OpenAlex | W3217703173 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
Visual attention is a fundamental aspect of most everyday decisions, and governments and companies spend vast resources competing for the attention of decision makers. In natural environments, choice options differ on a variety of visual factors, such as salience, position, or surface size. However, most decision theories ignore such visual factors, focusing on cognitive factors such as preferences as determinants of attention. To provide a systematic review of how the visual environment guides attention we meta-analyze 122 effect sizes on eye movements in decision making. A psychometric meta-analysis and Top10 sensitivity analysis show that visual factors play a similar or larger role than cognitive factors in determining attention. The visual factors that most influence attention are positioning information centrally, ρ = .43 (Top10 = .67), increasing the surface size, ρ = .35 (Top10 = .43), reducing the set size of competing information elements, ρ = .24 (Top10 = .24), and increasing visual salience, ρ = .13 (Top10 = .24). Cognitive factors include attending more to preferred choice options and attributes, ρ = .36 (Top10 = .31), effects of task instructions on attention, ρ = .35 (Top10 = .21), and attending more to the ultimately chosen option, ρ = .59 (Top10 = .26). Understanding real-world decision making will require the integration of both visual and cognitive factors in future theories of attention and decision making. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved
Cognitive psychology · Perception · Visual perception · Color perception and design · Computer Science · Neuroscience · Psychology
The power of seeing less
Interactive media and time assessment
Focal Visual Attention in Crime Decision Making
Not all consumer-generated images are attractive and persuasive
Attribute attention and option attention in risky choice
Brand-Related and Information-Sharing Cues as Decision Aid for Smartphone Users at Different Levels of Persuasion Knowledge to Assess mHealth App Credibility
Attentional Mechanism Underlying Asymmetric Subjective Opportunity Cost Effect in Intertemporal Choice
Order in multi‐attribute product choice decisions
Information Search Patterns in Intertemporal Choice Do Not Always Reflect Decision Strategies
Eyes on the account size
Kinesthetic Properties of Response Scales Yield Different Judgments
Choosing not to see
| Citations per year | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |