Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

On the adequacy of current empirical evaluations of formal models of categorization

Bibliographic Data

ID4424017
AuthorsA J Wills (0000-0003-4803-0367), Emmanuel M Pothos (0000-0003-1919-387X)
Year2012
Volume138
Issue1
Pages102-125
Publication date2012-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychological Bulletin (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-2909 • E-ISSN: 1939-1455
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/a0025715
PMID22061692
OpenAlexW2129038834
LanguageEN
Citations received12

Categorization is one of the fundamental building blocks of cognition, and the study of categorization is notable for the extent to which formal modeling has been a central and influential component of research. However, the field has seen a proliferation of noncomplementary models with little consensus on the relative adequacy of these accounts. Progress in assessing the relative adequacy of formal categorization models has, to date, been limited because (a) formal model comparisons are narrow in the number of models and phenomena considered and (b) models do not often clearly define their explanatory scope. Progress is further hampered by the practice of fitting models with arbitrarily variable parameters to each data set independently. Reviewing examples of good practice in the literature, we conclude that model comparisons are most fruitful when relative adequacy is assessed by comparing well-defined models on the basis of the number and proportion of irreversible, ordinal, penetrable successes (principles of minimal flexibility, breadth, good-enough precision, maximal simplicity, and psychological focus

Categorical variable · Categorization · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Econometrics · Epistemology · Flexibility (engineering · Machine learning · Scope (computer science · Set (abstract data type · Simplicity · Statistics · Categorization, perception, and language · Child and Animal Learning Development · Cognitive Science and Mapping · Computer Science · Mathematics · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • The Bayesian evaluation of categorization models

    Wolf Vanpaemel, Michael D Lee et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2012

  • Benchmarks for models of short-term and working memory

    Klaus Oberauer, Lewandowsky et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2018

  • On the adequacy of Bayesian evaluations of categorization models

    A J Wills, Emmanuel M Pothos•Psychological Bulletin•2012

  • Addressing the theory crisis in psychology

    Open Access•Klaus Oberauer, Lewandowsky•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2019

  • Is Man the Measure of All Things? A Social Cognitive Account of Androcentrism

    Open Access•April H Bailey, Mélisse Lafrance et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2019

  • Attention and associative learning in humans

    Mike E Le Pelley, Chris J Mitchell et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2016

  • Disentangling Perceptual and Process-Related Sources of Behavioral Variability in Categorization

    Open Access•Florian I Seitz, Jana B Jarecki et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2025

  • How Computational Modeling Can Force Theory Building in Psychological Science

    Open Access•Olivia Guest, Andrea E Martin•Perspectives on Psychological…•2021

  • Reconciling category exceptions through representational shifts

    Open Access•Yongzhen Xie, Michael L Mack•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2024

  • Featural relations in concept learning and generalization

    Open Access•Matthew Wetzel, Kenneth J Kurtz•Cognition•2025

  • Effects of categorical and numerical feedback on category learning

    Open Access•Astin C Cornwall, Tyler Davis et al.•Cognition•2022

  • Transfer of a novel discriminative function across functional stimulus class members in rats

    Open Access•Madeleine G Mason, Elijah J Richardson et al.•Journal of the Experimental…•2025

Unique citing works12
Citations per year0,86
Citation span2012 - 2025 (14)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae