Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The efficacy of violence prediction

A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools

Bibliographic Data

ID4425548
AuthorsMin Yang (0000-0001-9017-5960, University of Nottingham), Stephen C P Wong (University of Nottingham), Jeremy Coid (0000-0002-9480-0257, University of London)
Year2010
Volume136
Issue5
Pages740-767
Publication date2010-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychological Bulletin (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-2909 • E-ISSN: 1939-1455
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/a0020473
PMID20804235
OpenAlexW2059165232
LanguageEN
Citations received83
References cited28

Actuarial risk assessment tools are used extensively to predict future violence, but previous studies comparing their predictive accuracies have produced inconsistent findings as a result of various methodological issues. We conducted meta-analyses of the effect sizes of 9 commonly used risk assessment tools and their subscales to compare their predictive efficacies for violence. The effect sizes were extracted from 28 original reports published between 1999 and 2008, which assessed the predictive accuracy of more than one tool. We used a within-subject design to improve statistical power and multilevel regression models to disentangle random effects of variation between studies and tools and to adjust for study features. All 9 tools and their subscales predicted violence at about the same moderate level of predictive efficacy with the exception of Psychopathy Checklist--Revised (PCL-R) Factor 1, which predicted violence only at chance level among men. Approximately 25% of the total variance was due to differences between tools, whereas approximately 85% of heterogeneity between studies was explained by methodological features (age, length of follow-up, different types of violent outcome, sex, and sex-related interactions). Sex-differentiated efficacy was found for a small number of the tools. If the intention is only to predict future violence, then the 9 tools are essentially interchangeable; the selection of which tool to use in practice should depend on what other functions the tool can perform rather than on its efficacy in predicting violence. The moderate level of predictive accuracy of these tools suggests that they should not be used solely for some criminal justice decision making that requires a very high level of accuracy such as preventive detention

Checklist · Cognitive psychology · Meta-analysis · Outcome (game theory) · Poison control · Predictive power · Predictive validity · Statistics · Variance (accounting) · Clinical Psychology · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Mathematics · Medicine · Psychology · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

  • Rehabilitation of Islamist terrorists

    Sam Mullins•Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict•2010

  • Granting Leave to Patients in Bavarian Forensic-Psychiatric Hospitals

    Open Access•Halina Sklenarova, Janina Neutze et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2020

  • Investigating the role of the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised in United States case law

    David Dematteo, John F Edens et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2013

  • Prescriptive approaches to communicating the risk of violence in actuarial risk assessment

    Nicholas Scurich, Richard S John•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2011

  • The individual risk assessment of terrorism

    Jl Monahan, John Monahan•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2012

  • Virtue and the Law

    Open Access•Deborah L Rhode•Law & Social Inquiry•2017

  • Judicial gatekeeping on scientific validity with risk assessment tools

    Open Access•Melissa Hamilton•Behavioral Sciences & the Law•2020

  • From risk assessment to risk management

    Open Access•Jay P Singh, Sarah L Desmarai et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2014

  • Clinical and Forensic Issues in the Assessment of PsychopathyThe authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of James F. Hemphill to the previous version of this chapter.

    Open Access•Stephen D Hart, Jennifer E Storey•Handbook of Psychology, Second…•2012

  • Clinical Forensic Psychology

    Open Access•Kevin S Douglas, Randy K Otto et al.•Handbook of Psychology, Second…•2012

  • Doing Justice, Preventing Crime

    Michael Tonry•Doing Justice, Preventing Crime•2020

  • Risk and Needs Assessments in Prisons

    Joe Russo, Michael Vermeer et al.•2020

  • Thirty years of research on the Level of Service Scales

    Mark E Olver, Keira C Stockdale et al.•Psychological Assessment•2014

  • Predictions put into practice

    Open Access•Jessica Saunders, Priscillia Hunt et al.•Journal of Experimental Criminology•2016

  • Layers of Bias

    Open Access•Laurel Eckhouse, Kristian Lum et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2019

  • Publication Bias in the Organizational Sciences

    Open Access•Sven Kepe, Sven Kepes et al.•Organizational Research Methods•2012

  • Psychopathic Personality

    Open Access•Jennifer L Skeem, Devon L L Polaschek et al.•Psychological Science in the…•2011

  • Correlation study of BDNF/TrkB/CREB, violence, and cognitive function in first-episode drug-naive schizophrenia patients

    Open Access•Tiankai Jiang, Zhipeng Li et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2025

  • Interrater and intra-rater reliability of the Vera-2R tool

    Open Access•Nils Duits, Maaike Kempes•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2023

  • Determinants of Dropout From Correctional Offender Treatment

    Open Access•Franziska Brünner, Insa Neumann et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2019

  • Narrative Case Notes Have the Potential to Predict Seclusion 3 Days in Advance

    Open Access•Clara Stepanow, Jefim Stepanow et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2019

  • The Validity of Violence Risk Assessment in Young Adults

    Open Access•Anneke T H Kleeven, Michiel de Vries Robbé et al.•Emerging Adulthood•2023

  • Violence Risk Assessment and Risk Management

    Open Access•Antonia Sorge, Giovanni Borrelli et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Forensic-Psychiatric Risk Evaluations

    Open Access•Tenzin Wangmo, Helene Seaward et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2021

  • Challenges to court room mental health decision-making in the face of uncertainty

    Open Access•Conor Duggan, Jaydip Sarkar•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2026

  • The added value of self-reported complaints in the prediction of recidivism in Dutch forensic outpatients

    Joan E van Horn, Mara J Eisenberg et al.•Psychology, Crime & Law•2026

  • Developmental Psychology

    Open Access•Ross D Parke, K Alison Clarke‐stewart•Handbook of Psychology, Second…•2012

  • Misery of the dark world

    Open Access•Priyanka Biswas, Nilanjana Das Chatterjee•SN Social Sciences•2024

  • Probation Officer Assessments of Risk when the Youth Look Different

    Open Access•Carla G Munoz, Rachael T Perrault et al.•Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice•2021

  • Risk-Based Sentencing and Predictive Accuracy

    Open Access•Jesper Ryberg•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2020

  • Tailoring to a Mandate

    Zachary Hamilton, Grant Duwe et al.•Justice Quarterly•2022

  • The Internet is a scary place

    Open Access•Madison R Lord, Ashley B Batastini et al.•Behavioral Sciences & the Law•2024

  • Applying the Rules of Evidence to Expert Testimony About Risk

    Open Access•Christopher Slobogin•Behavioral Sciences & the Law•2026

  • Are risk assessment tools more accurate than unstructured judgments in predicting violent, any, and sexual offending? A meta‐analysis of direct comparison studies

    Open Access•Jodi L Viljoen, Ilvy Goossens et al.•Behavioral Sciences & the Law•2025

  • Therapeutic and risk relevance of psychopathy and general criminal attitude change in an institutional sexual offense treatment program

    Open Access•Carissa M Augustyn, Mark E Olver•Behavioral Sciences & the Law•2024

  • Are psychopaths moral‐psychologically impaired? Reassessing emotion‐theoretical explanations

    Open Access•Rasmus Rosenberg Larsen•Mind & Language•2022

  • Independent serious case reviews relating to serious further offences since 2005

    Open Access•Dominic Pearson, Grace Carey•Probation Journal•2026

  • Risk management in open prisons

    Open Access•Gary Goodley, Dominic Pearson•Probation Journal•2023

  • Innovations in violence risk assessment

    Open Access•Stephanie R Penney•International Journal of Law and…•2021

  • Assessing the validity of self-report of psychopathy short-form (SRP-SF) in incarcerated offenders from Chile and Uruguay

    Open Access•Nicolás Trajtenberg, Olga Sánchez de Ribera et al.•International Journal of Law and…•2023

  • The Problems (and possible solutions) of assessing risk, race and recidivism in long operating drug treatment courts

    Open Access•Kristen E DeVall, Paul D Gregory et al.•Evaluation and Program Planning•2025

  • The Violence Prevention Program in South Australia

    Open Access•Gene Mercer, Emma Ziersch et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2022

  • Clinical Overrides With the YLS/CMI

    Open Access•Geneviève Parent, Marie-Pier Bilodeau et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2023

  • Predictive Validity of the HCR-20 V3 With Incarcerated Males in Mexico City

    Open Access•Alicia Nijdam‐Jones, Eric García-López et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2021

  • An Empirical Test of the Factor Structure of the Violence Risk Scale and Its Measurement Invariance Across Time and Cultural Groups

    Open Access•Yilma Woldgabreal, Andrew Day et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2022

  • Normative Data, Predictive Validity, and Factor Structure of a Fourth-Generation Risk Assessment Tool (Orac-PCQ) in a Population of Adjudicated Individuals Serving Short Sentences in the Province of Québec (Canada)

    Open Access•Guy Giguère, Sébastien Brouillette-Alarie et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2026

  • Protective Factor Assessments

    Open Access•Milena Abbiati, Philippe Golay et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2020

  • Racist Algorithms or Systemic Problems? Risk Assessments and Racial Disparities

    Open Access•Gina M Vincent, Jodi L Viljoen•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2020

  • Combining Static and Dynamic Recidivism Risk Information Into the Five-Level Risk and Needs System

    Open Access•Darcy J Coulter, Caleb D Lloyd et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2022

  • Resistance to Antisocial Peers in Adolescents Found Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder

    Open Access•Nicol Patricny, Andrew M Haag et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2022

  • An Examination of the Professional Override of the Level of Service Inventory–Ontario Revision

    Open Access•Laura C Orton, Neil R Hogan et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2021

  • Criminal Histories and Rates of Recidivism Among Two Subtypes of Psychopathic Individuals

    Open Access•Shelby S Weaver, Monika Dargis et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2022

  • An Economic Analysis of Crime Costs Associated with Psychopathic Personality Disorder and Violence Risk

    Open Access•Dylan T Gatner, Kevin S Douglas et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2023

  • Algorithms and the Individual in Criminal Law

    Open Access•Renée Jorgensen Bolinger•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•2022

  • Die Erfassung der Deliktschwere in Evaluationsstudien zur Straftäterbehandlung

    Lora Lauchs, Eva Link et al.•Monatsschrift für Kriminologie…•2020

  • Use of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in Legal Contexts

    David Dematteo, Mark E Olver•Journal of Personality Assessment•2022

  • Measurement Invariance and Convergent Validity of the Psychopathy Checklist

    Open Access•Ryan Botha, Devon L L Polaschek et al.•Journal of Personality Assessment•2025

  • Testing the Factor Structure of the Psychopathy Checklist

    Ryan Veal, Stefan Luebbers et al.•Journal of Personality Assessment•2021

  • Criterion Validity of the Psychopathy Checklist in Legal Contexts

    Open Access•L Holper, Caroline Ehrbar et al.•Journal of Personality Assessment•2025

  • Do We Hold Males and Females to the Same Standard? A Measurement Invariance Study on the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised

    Evelyn Klein Haneveld, Dylan Molenaar et al.•Journal of Personality Assessment•2022

  • The Contours of Assessment

    Michael Campagna, Ming‐li Hsieh et al.•Corrections•2019

  • Transitional processes culminating in extreme violence

    Open Access•Donald G Dutton•Journal of Aggression Conflict…•2012

  • Developing an empirical classification of violent offences for use in the prediction of recidivism in England and Wales

    Open Access•Philip Howard, Louise Dixon•Journal of Aggression Conflict…•2011

  • Does vegetation matter for the criminal behavior among people with serious mental illness

    Open Access•Woojae Han, Miesha Marzell et al.•Asian Social Work and Policy Review•2019

  • More than just early release

    Open Access•Susan Turner•Criminology & Public Policy•2011

  • Threat assessment as a school violence prevention strategy

    Open Access•Dewey G Cornell•Criminology & Public Policy•2020

  • Indigenous perspectives on violence risk assessment

    Open Access•Stephane M Shepherd, Cynthia Willis-Esqueda•Punishment & Society•2017

  • What is wrong about Robocops as consultants? A technology-centric critique of predictive policing

    Open Access•Martin Degeling, Bettina Berendt•AI & Society•2018

  • Gender Effects in Actuarial Risk Assessment

    Guy Giguère, Tamsin Higgs et al.•Women & Criminal Justice•2025

  • Is it Possible to Use the HCR-20 V2 to Assess the Risk of Violent Recidivism of French Offenders

    Open Access•Ingrid Bertsch, Robert Courtois et al.•Forensic Sciences Research•2022

  • A Commentary on Statistical Assessment of Violence Recidivism Risk

    Open Access•Peter B Imrey, Philip Dawid•Statistics and Public Policy•2015

  • Validation of the Orac-PCQ, an actuarial risk assessment tool for general recidivism

    Open Access•Guy Giguère, Patrick Lussier et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•2025

  • Stalking

    Open Access•Tk Logan, T K Logan et al.•Trauma Violence & Abuse•2017

  • Risk assessment of recidivism in Latin America

    Nicolás Trajtenberg, Olga Sánchez de Ribera et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Fifty Years of American Sentencing Reform

    Michael Tonry•Crime and Justice•2019

  • Predictions of Dangerousness in Sentencing

    Michael Tonry•Crime and Justice•2019

  • Impulsive versus premeditated aggression in the prediction of violent criminal recidivism

    Open Access•Marc T Swogger, Zach Walsh et al.•Aggressive Behavior•2015

  • Brain imaging research on psychopathy

    Open Access•Rebecca Umbach, Colleen M Berryessa et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•2015

  • Capturing clinical complexity

    Open Access•D J Cooke, Caroline Logan•Journal of Criminal Justice•2015

  • Risk, Race, and Recidivism

    Open Access•Jennifer L Skeem, CHRISTOPHER T LOWENKAMP•Criminology•2016

  • Evaluating social protective factors for violence involvement in Honduras

    Tom Hare, Laura E Miller-Graff et al.•Development in Practice•2020

  • Institutional Effectiveness and Economic Development

    Open Access•Navneet Kumar Singh, Nikee Silayach et al.•American Journal of Economics and…•2025

  • Psychopathy and Gender in Three Faces of Homicide

    Jiseun Sohn, Ji Seun Sohn et al.•Deviant Behavior•2025

  • Predicting violent behavior

    John Monahan•Predicting violent behavior•1981

  • Serious and Violent Juvenile Offenders

    David P Farrington, Rolf Loeber•Serious and Violent Juvenile…•1998

  • Methods of Meta-Analysis

    Frank L Schmidt, J E Hunter•Methods of Meta-Analysis•2015

  • Methods of Meta-Analysis

    Frank L Schmidt, John Hunter et al.•Methods of Meta-Analysis•2004

  • Fixed Effects vs. Random Effects Meta‐Analysis Models

    Open Access•J E Hunter, Frank L Schmidt•International Journal of…•2000

  • Refining the construct of psychopathy

    D J Cooke, Christine Michie•Psychological Assessment•2001

  • The revised Psychopathy Checklist

    Robert D Hare, Timothy J Harpur et al.•Psychological Assessment•1990

  • The Recent Past and Near Future of Risk and/or Need Assessment

    Open Access•D A Andrews, James Bonta et al.•Crime & Delinquency•2006

  • Classification for Effective Rehabilitation

    Open Access•D A Andrews, James Bonta et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•1990

  • Coming to Terms With the Terms of Risk

    Helena C Kraemer•Archives of General Psychiatry•1997

  • Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies

    Marnie E Rice, Grant T Harris•Law and Human Behavior•2005

  • Clinical Versus Actuarial Judgment

    Open Access•Robyn M Dawes, David Faust et al.•Science•1989

  • Improving risk assessments for sex offenders

    R Karl Hanson, David Thornton et al.•Law and Human Behavior•2000

  • The Prediction of Violence in Adult Offenders

    Open Access•Mary Ann Campbell, Sheila French et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2009

  • Understanding and Controlling Crime

    Open Access•David P Farrington, Lloyd E Ohlin et al.•Understanding and Controlling Crime•1986

  • The Psychology of Criminal Conduct

    D A Andrews, James Bonta•Psychology of Criminal Conduct•2014

  • A classification tree approach to the development of actuarial violence risk assessment tools

    Henry J Steadman, E Silver et al.•Law and Human Behavior•2000

  • Public Protection, Partnership and Risk Penality

    Open Access•Hazel Kemshall, Mike Maguire•Punishment & Society•2001

  • Assessing juvenile offenders

    Open Access•Anthony P Thompson, Zoe Pope•Australian Psychologist•2005

  • Does Correctional Treatment Work? A Clinically Relevant and Psychologically Informed Meta‐analysis

    Open Access•D A Andrews, IVAN ZINGER et al.•Criminology•1990

  • Behavioral sciences and the law

    Robert L Stubblefield•American Journal of Orthopsychiatry•1966

  • Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures

    William M Grove, Paul E Meehl•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1996

  • The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale

    Stephen C P Wong, Audrey Gordon•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2006

  • Violence risk assessment

    Kevin S Douglas, Jennifer L Skeem•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2005

  • A Meta-Analysis of the Predictors of Adult Offender Recidivism

    Open Access•Paul Gendreau, Tracy Little et al.•Criminology•1996

  • The influence of households on drinking behaviour

    Open Access•Nigel Rice, Roy Carr‐hill et al.•Social Science & Medicine•1998

  • Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores

    Paul E Meehl, Albert Rosen•Psychological Bulletin•1955

  • Age and the Explanation of Crime

    Travis Hirschi, Michael R Gottfredson et al.•American Journal of Sociology•1983

Unique citing works83
Citations per year5,19
Citation span2010 - 2026 (17)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 75

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae