The environments of environmental impact assessment
Transforming neoliberal environmental governance from within
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4464839 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Arthur Snow (0000-0002-4641-8969, University of Manchester, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 1462-1486 |
| Publication date | 2021-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environment and Planning E Nature and Space (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2514-8486 • E-ISSN: 2514-8494 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/2514848620958370 |
| OpenAlex | W3088525008 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 87 |
The transformation of neoliberal environmental governance is beset by conceptual and empirical complexity. Utilising a governmentality conceptual and analytical framework, this piece seeks to illustrate how, on their own terms, environmental governance interventions create the potential for change via a modality I have labelled the temporalised environment. Through a discourse analysis of select guidance and regulatory documents, a programmer's view of environmental impact assessment in England and Wales is generated. As both an object and a technology of governmental power, I show how the environment can reinforce extant neoliberal logics (as 'artefact') or be productive of a new re-socialised, globalising form of biopower (as 'aspiration'). I explore the risks posed to the transformative potential of the latter 'aspirational' environment in terms of difficulties distinguishing between its neoliberal and non-neoliberal effects, its capture by neoliberal institutions, and the scalability of its transformation from local to global. I argue that these can only be adequately mitigated if a continued critical disposition is adopted towards the defining features, purpose and functionality of an environment. I propose a series of straightforward questions to aid this process. Overall, this distinction between artefactual and aspirational environments is intended to be heuristic, orienting those strategising against neoliberal environmental governance towards the instabilities internal to the logic of specific interventions
Biopower · Corporate governance · Economics · Environmental ethics · Environmental governance · Epistemology · Governmentality · Management · Political science · Social science · Sociology · Transformative learning · Environmental and Social Impact Assessments · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities · Law · Mining and Resource Management
What would environmental impact assessment look like if we started from scratch today? Designing better EIA for developed neoliberal nations
Legible natures and the (re)making of environmental impact assessments in the U.S.-Mexico borderlands
Regimes of Environmental Truth
Rewriting the climate social contract
Three waves of resource nationalism
The Will to Improve
Transformative Environmental Governance
Environmental Governance
The Effectiveness of Eia as an Instrument for Environmental Governance
Connectivity and the Governance of Multilevel Social-Ecological Systems
Environmental Governance
Title unavailable
Foucauldian Discourse Analysis
Neoliberalism and Rule by Experts
Powers of Life and Death Beyond Governmentality
The Post-Politics of Sustainability Planning
Community Participation, Rights, and Responsibilities
A faultline in neoliberal environmental governance scholarship? Or, why accumulation-by-alienation matters
The interminable issue of effectiveness
Contentious politics in environmental assessment
The Subject and Power
Discipline and Punish
Ideology and Consciousness
Environmentality
Powers of Freedom
Opening up Planning? Planning Reform in an Era of ‘Open Government’
French Modern
Neoliberal environmentality
Explaining (with) Neoliberalism
An argument with neoliberalism
Biopower Today
Zombie neoliberalism and the ambidextrous state
Genealogies of resilience
Climate change and the transition to neoliberal environmental governance
Earth System governmentality
Environmental governance in motion
Resisting (nuclear) power? Environmental regulation in South Africa
The Product of Text and ‘Other’ Statements
Reconceptualizing public participation in environmental assessment as EA civics
Understanding EIA scoping in practice
Environmental impact assessment
Understanding the long-term influence of EIA on organisational learning and transformation
Environmental assessment and planning theory
Purposes, paradigms and pressure groups
Public participation in environmental impact assessment
Neoliberalizing Space
Neoliberal Capitalism and Conservation in the Post‐crisis Era
Reconnecting to the Biosphere
The Financial Crisis and Environmental Governance ‘After’ Neoliberalism
Progressive localism and the construction of political alternatives
Environmental governance and the hybrid regime of Australian natural resource management
EIAs, power and political ecology
Environmental governance through guidance
Programming Environments
Ethics
The Work of Neoliberal Governmentality
Governmentality
Reconfiguring environmental governance
Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city
Green governmentality
Governance Innovation and the Citizen
The Uses of Neoliberalism
Using Foucault's Methods
Post-Foucauldian governmentality
Political ecologies of the state
Urban Political Ecology
The antinomies of nature and space
Biopolitics, Biopower, and the Return of Sovereignty
Epidemiology as an investigative paradigm
Neoliberalism
A New Urban Dispositif? Governing Life in an Age of Climate Change
The decision you make today will affect many generations to come
Diverse ecologies
The biopower of ignorance
The socioenvironmental state
Environmental governmentality
From Neoliberalism to Neoliberalisation
Governance for Sustainability
Neoliberalising Nature
Whose environment
Neoliberalising Nature
Infrastructures of environmental governance
Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism
Governing economic life
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |