Methodology of Narrative Structural Analysis
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4473255 |
|---|---|
| Autores | William O Hendricks (autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1973 |
| Volumen | 7 |
| Número | 2 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1973-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Semiotica (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0037-1998 • E-ISSN: 1613-3692 |
| Editorial | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/semi.1973.7.2.163 |
| OpenAlex | W2007525059 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 6 |
| Referencias citadas | 5 |
Present-day analysts of narrative structure, working in the tradition of Propp and other formalists, have succeeded in effecting many improvements in the concepts and techniques of their predecessors.However, in one respect at least, they have not advanced beyond the work of Propp in that they continue to by-pass what may be termed the 'textual surface' of narratives, i. e. the constituent sentences of the narrative text as it is presented to the reader (hearer). 1One manifestation of this neglect is that analysts take as their point of departure, not the text itself of a given narrative, but rather a synopsis of the text.For instance, Tzvetan Todorov, in his recently published study of the Decameron (1969: 16), explicitly states that he deals more with synopses of the stories than with the stories themselves. 2 This practice can be justified in that it reflects the correct intuition that narrative structure is, in a sense, 'independent' of the linguistic means by which it is manifested.More exactly stated, there are a number of respects in which the underlying narrative structure differs from the textual surface.Perhaps the most important difference is in the disparity between
Linguistics · Narrative · Narrative inquiry · Semiotics · Philosophy · Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
| Obras citantes distintas | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,12 |
| Intervalo de citas | 1976 - 2015 (40) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 5 |