Translating iconicities of classical Chinese poetry

In the history of translating classical Chinese poetry, there are two kinds of translators. The first kind translate classical Chinese poetry "by way of intellectual, directional devices" (Yip, Wai-lim. 1969. Ezra Pound's Cathay. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press: 16). What these translators are concerned with most is the coherence of their translations. They give little attention to the ideogrammic nature of Chinese characters. I call them traditional translators. These translators include those in the history of translating classical Chinese poetry from its beginning to the first decade of the twentieth century, although there are still some who translate classical Chinese poetry in this way later. The second kind of translator is highly interested in the images created by ideogrammic Chinese characters and tries to convey them in target language. We call them modernist translators. These translators are represented by some American modernist poets such as Ezra Pound, Amy Lowell, Florence Ayscough, etc. From the point of view of iconicity, modernist translators' contribution lies in their concern with the iconic characteristics of Chinese characters. But they did not give enough attention to syntactical iconicity and textual iconicity in classical Chinese poetry

Art · Chinese poetry · Classical Chinese · Classical Chinese poetry · Iconicity · Linguistics · Literature · Poetry · Pound (networking) · Computer Science · History · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Philosophy · Translation Studies and Practices · Visual Culture and Art Theory

• Semiotics East and West

  Open Access•Guangxu Zhao•Semiotica•2022

  Add to list

• The Poetics of Error

  Hugh Kenner•Modern Language Notes•1975

  Add to list