The argumentative and rhetorical function of multimodal metonymy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4474932 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andrea Rocci (0000-0001-7156-5402, Institute of Argumentation, Linguistics, and Semiotics , Lugano , Switzerland), Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati (Università della Svizzera italiana), Chiara Pollaroli (Università della Svizzera italiana, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 2018 |
| Issue | 220 |
| Pages | 123-153 |
| Publication date | 2018-01-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Semiotica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0037-1998 • E-ISSN: 1613-3692 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/sem-2015-0152 |
| OpenAlex | W2840204043 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 26 |
The aim of this article is to contribute to the theoretical development of multimodal metonymy and the argumentative and rhetorical role that the trope can fulfil in multimodal advertising campaigns. A model for the analysis of multimodal tropes in page-based advertising messages is developed by drawing insights from different disciplines. This model involves the identification of the elementary and layout components of the message, the description of its multimodal structure (in terms of the visual structure and the contribution of the verbal component), the reconstruction of its meaning operation, and the reconstruction of its enthymematic structure. In particular, the meaning operation is reconstructed by the employment of Conceptual Integration Theory, which we have slightly revised in order to better account for metonymical mappings. The enthymematic structure is reconstructed following the Argumentum Model of Topics, a model of argument schemes that enables one to make explicit the contextual and the logical dimensions of arguments. Based on the tenets of the two frameworks, we claim that multimodal metonymy condenses and gives access to a complex chain of connections, which mirrors the argumentation the audience is invited to infer. This argumentation is based on causal schemes of reasoning. This claim results in the in-depth analysis of both a billboard belonging to an anti-AIDS campaign and a social campaign by Greenpeace against the use of environmental-damaging paper for toy packages by Mattel
Argument (complex analysis) · Argumentation theory · Argumentative · Epistemology · Function (biology) · Linguistics · Meaning (existential) · Metonymy · Persuasion · Rhetorical question · Trope (literature) · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · linguistics and terminology studies · Philosophy · Psychology
Metonymy, metaphor, and multimodal civic meaning-making in children’s tax-themed postcards
Fresh perspectives on multimodal argument reconstruction
When Images Speak Louder than Logic
Metaphors and metonymies in the multimodal discourse of whaling
The Sino–US trade war in political cartoons
One Hundred Ways to Resist Corporate Branding
Boycott Israel
Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising
Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse
Mappings in Thought and Language
Mental Spaces
Rethinking Metaphor
Conceptual Integration Networks
Blending and metaphor
Beyond Visual Metaphor
Metaphor in Pictures and Multimodal Representations
A Systematic Theory of Argumentation
Argumentative Indicators in Discourse
Tropical Truth(s)
Visual Rhetoric in Advertising
Rhétorique de l'image
Figures of Rhetoric in Advertising Language
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,4 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |