The limits of satire, or the reification of cultural politics

Bibliographic Data

ID4480786
AuthorsN Holm (0000-0003-0391-939X, Massey University, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume174
Issue1
Pages81-97
Publication date2023-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThesis Eleven (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0725-5136 • E-ISSN: 1461-7455
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/07255136231154266
OpenAlexW4320918530
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited42

In the first decades of the 21st century, humour has been increasingly embraced as a legitimate means by which to cover, analyse and intervene in political issues. Most frequently, this political application of humour has been interpreted through the lens of 'satire': a term that evokes an idea of humour as a politically meaningful cultural act. Such an account of humour connects satire with the long-standing theoretical tradition of 'cultural politics' that explores the ability and mechanism of cultural forms to inform, inspire or enact political change. However, while satire may appear as the manifestation or culmination of a cultural political agenda, I argue that the concept ultimately works towards the closure of cultural political possibility. Drawing on the work of Georg Lukács and Fredric Jameson, I argue that satire is better understood as a form of reification that prematurely resolves how, when and why cultural forms can do politics

Aesthetics · Culmination · Epistemology · Political science · Politics · Reification (Marxism · Sociology · Anthropology · Critical Theory and Political Philosophy · Cultural Studies · Humor Studies and Applications · Law · Music History and Culture · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access