Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Um das Leben würfeln

Losentscheidung, Kriegsrecht und inszenierte Willkür in der Frühen Neuzeit

Bibliographic Data

ID4548385
AuthorsBarbara Stollberg-Rilinger (Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Historisches Seminar Domplatz 20–22, D-48 143 Münster Deutschland), Barbara Stollberg‐rilinger (University of Münster, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume22
Issue2
Pages182-209
Publication date2014-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHistorische Anthropologie (BOOK_SERIES)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0942-8704 • E-ISSN: 2194-4032
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.7788/ha-2014-0203
OpenAlexW2019857175
LanguageDE
Citations received3

Scholarly literature of the Early Modern period often mentions that soldiers who had committed a collective crime, such as mutiny or desertion, had to toss a dice in order to decide whether they were to be executed or saved. The article asks to what extent such decision by lot really was a military practice. It begins by reconstructing the context of the theological and legal debates dealing with the general issue of decision by lot, traces the reception of the ancient Roman praxis of ‚decimatio‘ by the late humanism, and shows that it was implemented into positive military law all over Europa in the aftermath of the Thirty Years’ War. Evidence for cases in which individuals were in fact gambling for their life is, however, hard to come by. Only very few, spectacular cases have so far been documented. For these cases, it can be shown that the decision by lot did not have a religious meaning and that it always remained contested as well. It thus turns out that the practice of the ‚Decimatio‘ embodied an economic as well as a psychological, but not a legal rationality: Justitia does not throw the dice – she levels a scale

Aesthetics · Archaeology · Dice · Epistemology · Humanism · Mutiny · Political science · Praxis · Rationality · Sociology · Witness · History · Law · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity

  • Entscheiden als Problem der Geschichtswissenschaft.

    Philip Hoffmann‐Rehnitz, Philip Hoffmann-Rehnitz et al.•Zeitschrift für Historische…•2018

  • Navigating the social dilemma of autonomous systems

    Open Access•Anja Bodenschatz•Ethics and Information Technology•2025

  • Élection et tirage au sort à Venise ( xiii e - xvi e siècle)

    Maud Harivel•Genèses•2024

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,38
Citation span2018 - 2025 (8)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae