Every Door Direct Mail in US survey research
An anonymous census approach to mail survey sampling
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4563699 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Emily Grubert (0000-0003-2196-7571, Georgia Institute of Technology, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2019-05-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Methodological Innovations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2059-7991 • E-ISSN: 2059-7991 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/2059799119862104 |
| OpenAlex | W2957553153 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 9 |
Mail surveys remain a popular method of eliciting attitudinal information, but declining response rates motivate inquiry into new, lower cost methods of contacting potential respondents. This work presents methodological findings from a medium-sized (~12,000 addresses) mail survey testing a United States Postal Service direct mail product called Every Door Direct Mail as a low-cost approach to anonymous mail survey distribution. The results suggest that under certain conditions, Every Door Direct Mail can be a useful approach for mail survey distribution, with response rates similar to those observed with analogous first-class mailing approaches but lower cost per response. As a tool for postal carrier-route saturation mailing that does not use names or addresses, Every Door Direct Mail is potentially useful for researchers who work in small, specific geographies or value or require anonymity. The results from this work suggest good performance on demographics and socially undesirable answers for Every Door Direct Mail relative to addressed mailings. The major disadvantages include an inability to conduct household-level probability sampling, an inability to customize nonresponse follow-up, and minimum mailing sizes associated with the postal carrier route saturation requirement. Every Door Direct Mail is unlikely to become a major tool for survey researchers, but it could be useful in niche applications. This study introduces Every Door Direct Mail to the survey methodology literature and presents empirical data intended to help researchers considering using Every Door Direct Mail
Advertising · Anonymity · Business · Computer security · Direct mail · Direct marketing · Electronic mail · Internet privacy · Political science · Postal service · Statistics · Survey data collection · Computer Science · Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis · Mathematics · Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Spatial Optimism and Cross-Over Effects in the Perceptions of Interconnected Wildfire, Flood, and Mudslide Hazards
Hybridizing qualitative coding with natural language processing and deep learning to assess public comments
Medium and Message by Mail
Distributing a survey using Every Door Direct Mail in an ideal use case
The Need for a Preference‐Based Multicriteria Prioritization Framework in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment
Factors Affecting Response Rates to Natural Resource - Focused Mail Surveys
Changes in Telephone Survey Nonresponse over the Past Quarter Century
The Problems of Researching Sensitive Topics
Personalization of Mail Surveys for General Public and Populations with a Group Identity
Effects of Identifiers in Mail Surveys
| Citations per year | 1.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |