Distributing a survey using Every Door Direct Mail in an ideal use case
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4563779 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jacob C White (0009-0000-4627-1971), Jacob White (0000-0002-3557-3568, Michigan State University), Douglas L Bessette (0000-0001-7709-8518, Michigan State University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 89-100 |
| Publication date | 2025-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Methodological Innovations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2059-7991 • E-ISSN: 2059-7991 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/20597991251329754 |
| OpenAlex | W4409707508 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 45 |
While paper mail-based surveys avoid much of the risk of bots and fraudulent data, they suffer from lower response rates and ever-inflating material and logistical costs. In response, there is a nascent, but growing literature investigating a lower cost, explicitly anonymous, mail-based survey distribution method called Every Door Direct Mail (EDDM). This study contributes to this growing body of literature by using EDDM to disseminate a sequential mixed-mode census-style survey that meets best use-case recommendations per past research. We make several design alterations to elicit higher response rates including using an outer envelope and cash incentive. The survey, distributed near large-scale solar developments in three urban Michigan communities (~1554 households), was geographically based, targeted a specific and limited population, and covered the potentially sensitive topic of local solar development, which may have also led to a higher response rate. The survey achieved an overall response rate of 10.2% with 158 complete surveys returned, demonstrating this work's usefulness, use case, and flexibility
Computer security · Ideal (ethics · Political science · Computer Science · Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis · Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Data quality in online human-subjects research
Threats of Bots and Other Bad Actors to Data Quality Following Research Participant Recruitment Through Social Media
Reconsidering barriers to wind power projects
Online surveys
The inaccuracy of data from online surveys
Ensuring survey research data integrity in the era of internet bots
Hard-to-Survey Populations
Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys
Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed‐Mode Surveys
Web Versus Other Survey Modes
Comparison of an Internet Versus Mail Survey
Rural opposition to landscape change from solar energy
Good fences make good neighbors
Rallying the anti-crowd
Fraud in Online Surveys
Paper, E-mail, or Both? Effects of Contact Mode on Participation in a Web Survey of Establishments
Straightlining
Insights for the Drop-off/Pick-up Method to Improve Data Collection
The End of the (Research) World As We Know It? Understanding and Coping With Declining Response Rates to Mail Surveys
Effect of Monetary Incentives on Mail Survey Response Rates for Midwestern Farmers
Comparing Response Rates from Web and Mail Surveys
Within-Household Selection in Mail Surveys
The shape of and solutions to the MTurk quality crisis
The micro-task market for lemons
Every Door Direct Mail in US survey research
Reacting to the Rural Burden
| Highly cited | No |
|---|