Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The SPIRIT Action Framework

A structured approach to selecting and testing strategies to increase the use of research in policy

Bibliographic Data

ID4588919
AuthorsSally Redman (Sax Institute), Tari Turner (0000-0002-7990-1623, Monash University), Huw Davies (0000-0002-2653-3695, University of St Andrews), Anna Williamson (0000-0003-0897-4769, Sax Institute), Amanda Haynes (0000-0001-5703-5683, Sax Institute), Abby Haynes, Sue Brennan (0000-0003-1789-8809, Monash University), Andrew Milat (0000-0003-3126-3463, New South Wales Department of Health), Deborah O''Connor (0000-0002-6836-122X, Monash University), Denise O'Connor, Fiona Blyth (0000-0003-1128-6756, Sax Institute), Louisa Jorm (0000-0003-0390-661X, Western Sydney University), Sally Green (0000-0002-9564-9050, Monash University)
Year2015
Volume136-137
Pages147-155
Publication date2015-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Science & Medicine (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0277-9536 • E-ISSN: 1873-5347
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.009
PMID26004208
OpenAlexW1602037515
LanguageEN
Citations received20
References cited57

The recent proliferation of strategies designed to increase the use of research in health policy (knowledge exchange) demands better application of contemporary conceptual understandings of how research shapes policy. Predictive models, or action frameworks, are needed to organise existing knowledge and enable a more systematic approach to the selection and testing of intervention strategies. Useful action frameworks need to meet four criteria: have a clearly articulated purpose; be informed by existing knowledge; provide an organising structure to build new knowledge; and be capable of guiding the development and testing of interventions. This paper describes the development of the SPIRIT Action Framework. A literature search and interviews with policy makers identified modifiable factors likely to influence the use of research in policy. An iterative process was used to combine these factors into a pragmatic tool which meets the four criteria. The SPIRIT Action Framework can guide conceptually-informed practical decisions in the selection and testing of interventions to increase the use of research in policy. The SPIRIT Action Framework hypothesises that a catalyst is required for the use of research, the response to which is determined by the capacity of the organisation to engage with research. Where there is sufficient capacity, a series of research engagement actions might occur that facilitate research use. These hypotheses are being tested in ongoing empirical work

Action (physics · Action research · Business · Conceptual framework · Empirical research · Epistemology · Knowledge management · Management science · Process (computing · Process management · Psychological intervention · Risk analysis (engineering · Selection (genetic algorithm · Social science · Sociology · Community Health and Development · Computer Science · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Health Policy Implementation Science · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • From bench to policy

    Open Access•Seyyed Hadi Jabali, Shahram Yazdani et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2024

  • The spread of retracted research into policy literature

    Open Access•Dmitry Malkov, Ohid Yaqub et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2023

  • Powerful numbers

    Open Access•Diana Hicks, Kimberley R Isett•Quantitative Science Studies•2020

  • Virtual communities of practice in health and social care

    Open Access•Ollivier Prigent, Julie Lane et al.•Evaluation and Program Planning•2026

  • Pathways From Research Into Public Decision Making

    Open Access•Kimberley R Isett, Diana Hicks•Perspectives on Public Management…•2019

  • Tensions and Paradoxes of Scaling Up

    Open Access•Harriet Koorts, Adrian Bauman et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Policymakers’ Research Capacities, Engagement, and Use of Research in Public Health Policymaking

    Open Access•Natasa Loncarevic, Pernille Tanggaard Andersen et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Investigating the process of evidence-informed health policymaking in Bangladesh

    Open Access•Madeleine Dodd, Rebecca Ivers et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2019

  • The pivotal position of ‘liaison people’

    Open Access•Amanda Haynes, Phyllis Butow et al.•Evidence & Policy•2017

  • The carer-related knowledge exchange network (Caren)

    MARY LARKIN, Alisoun Milne•Evidence & Policy•2018

  • Missing in action? The role of the knowledge mobilisation literature in developing knowledge mobilisation practices

    Alison Powell, Huw Davies et al.•Evidence & Policy•2016

  • Instruments for assessing organisational capacity for use of evidence in health sector policy making

    Asra Asgharzadeh, Hosein Shabaninejad et al.•Evidence & Policy•2019

  • The Capabilities in Academic Policy Engagement (Cape) programme in England

    Open Access•Petra Mäkelä, Annette Boaz et al.•Evidence & Policy•2025

  • Leveraging research for health insurance coverage of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction

    Ariana M Albanese, Hannah E Frank et al.•Evidence & Policy•2025

  • Policy utilisation of occupational safety and health research

    Open Access•Charlotte Diana Nørregaard Rasmussen, Steffen Bohni Nielsen et al.•Evidence & Policy•2024

  • The interface between research funding and environmental policies in an emergent economy using neural topic modeling

    Open Access•Mauro W Barbosa, Andre Gomes•Review of Policy Research•2024

  • Building consensus between lived experience and professional stakeholders on mental health research priorities

    Open Access•Peter M Mcevoy, Benjamin Horgan et al.•Australian Psychologist•2024

  • The Evita framework for evidence-based mental health policy agenda setting in low- and middle-income countries

    Open Access•Nicole Votruba, Jonathan Grant et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2020

  • Insights on health policies from a political philosophy perspective

    Daniel G Abiétar, Mariacarla Martí-González et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2025

  • The Moral Regime of Midwifery Continuity of Carer Implementation in England

    Open Access•Aimee L Middlemi, Susan Channon et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2025

  • Knowledge Transfer and Exchange

    Open Access•Craig Mitton, Carol E Adair et al.•Milbank Quarterly•2007

  • Is it time to drop the ‘knowledge translation’ metaphor? A critical literature review

    Open Access•Trisha Greenhalgh, Saskia Wieringa et al.•Proceedings of the Royal Society…•2011

  • Lost in knowledge translation

    Open Access•Ian D Graham, Jo Logan et al.•Journal of Continuing Education…•2006

  • The utilisation of health research in policy-making

    Open Access•Steve Hanney, Stephen R Hanney et al.•Health Research Policy and Systems•2003

  • How Can Research Organizations More Effectively Transfer Research Knowledge to Decision Makers?

    Open Access•John N Lavis, Dave Robertson et al.•Milbank Quarterly•2003

  • Pathways to “Evidence-Informed” Policy and Practice

    Open Access•Shelley Bowen, Anthony B Zwi•PLoS Medicine•2005

  • Evaluating the Relevance, Generalization, and Applicability of Research

    Open Access•Lawrence W Green, Russell E Glasgow•Evaluation & the Health Professions•2006

  • Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence

    Open Access•Simon Innvær, Gunn Elisabeth Vist et al.•Journal of Health Services…•2002

  • A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers

    Open Access•Kathryn Oliver, Simon Innvar et al.•BMC Health Services Research•2014

  • Knowledge Exchange Processes in Organizations and Policy Arenas: A Narrative Systematic Review of the Literature

    Open Access•Damien Contandriopoulos, Marc Lemire et al.•Milbank Quarterly•2010

  • The effects of transformational and change leadership on employees' commitment to a change

    David M Herold, Donald B Fedor et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2008

  • The Use of Research Evidence in Public Health Decision Making Processes

    Open Access•Lois Orton, Ffion Lloyd-Williams et al.•PLoS ONE•2011

  • Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework

    Open Access•Alison L Kitson, Jo Rycroft‐malone et al.•Implementation Science•2008

  • Bridging Research and Practice

    Open Access•Rachel G Tabak, Rachel Tabak et al.•American Journal of Preventive…•2012

  • Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations

    Open Access•Trisha Greenhalgh, Glenn Robert et al.•Milbank Quarterly•2004

  • The concept of scalability

    Open Access•Andrew Milat, A J Milat et al.•Health Promotion International•2013

  • Self-efficacy

    Albert Bandura•Psychological Review•1977

  • Capturing practice

    Tanja Pritzlaff, Frank Nullmeier•Evidence & Policy•2011

  • Tools to support evidence-informed public health decision making

    Open Access•Jennifer Yost, Maureen Dobbins et al.•BMC Public Health•2014

  • A translational framework for public health research

    Open Access•David Ogilvie, Peter Craig et al.•BMC Public Health•2009

  • Systemic capacity building

    Open Access•C Potter, C C Potter•Health Policy and Planning•2004

  • Evidence Check

    Danielle Campbell, Braedon Donald et al.•Evidence & Policy•2011

  • The absorption of research knowledge by public civil servants

    Mathieu Ouimet, Réjean Landry et al.•Evidence & Policy•2009

  • Policy–research linkage

    Stefanie Ettelt, Nicholas Mays et al.•Evidence & Policy•2013

  • The ‘policy-preferences model’

    Chris Brown•Evidence & Policy•2012

  • Developing definitions for a knowledge exchange intervention in health policy and program agencies

    Amanda Haynes, Tari Turner et al.•International Journal of Social…•2014

  • Evaluation Training to Build Capability in the Community and Public Health Workforce

    Open Access•Jeffery Adams, Pauline Dickinson•American Journal of Evaluation•2010

  • An Alternate Route to Policy Influence

    Open Access•Carol Hirschon Weiss, Erin Murphy‐graham et al.•American Journal of Evaluation•2005

  • Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions

    Russell E Glasgow, Thomas Vogt et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1999

  • The Many Meanings of Research Utilization

    CAROL H WEISS•Public Administration Review•1979

  • What Is Population Health Intervention Research

    Open Access•Penelope Hawe, Leigh Potvin et al.•Canadian Journal of Public Health•2009

  • Complexity, 'practical rationality' and evidence-based policy making

    Ian Sanderson, Ian R Sanderson•Policy & Politics•2006

  • New Evidence on Instrumental, Conceptual, and Symbolic Utilization of University Research in Government Agencies

    Open Access•Noureddine Amara, Nabil Amara et al.•Science Communication•2004

  • Evidence-based health policy

    Open Access•Mark J Dobrow, Mark Dobrow et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2004

Unique citing works20
Citations per year2
Citation span2016 - 2026 (11)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 20

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae